BCL logo

Technical Reports

Vol. 2

Tools for transformation: Selecting a suite of digital tools for an online Change Laboratory

Submitted
April 17, 2025
Published
2025-04-17

Abstract

This technical report describes the set of digital tools that were used in a fully online Change Laboratory conducted over seven workshops in 2024 as part of the author’s Ph.D. Project “The Sustainability Change Laboratory.” The purpose of this report is to document the choices and design decisions the author made in the set-up of the digital space for the research project, to provide a categorisation of tools required to enable the various interactions between Change Laboratory participants, and to share the user experience of both participants and the researcher. The report also includes a set of criteria intended to assist other researchers planning a fully online Change Laboratory in their selection and choice of a digital toolset to be used.

References

  1. Bligh, B. & Flood, M. (2015). The Change Laboratory in Higher Education: research- inter-vention using activity theory. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (pp. 141–168). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
  2. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity Theory in empirical higher education research: choices, uses, and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(2), 125-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
  3. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Devel-opmental Research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit. http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/Learning-by-Expanding.pdf
  4. Engeström, Y., Pihlaja, J., Helle, M., Virkkunen, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The Change La-boratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1, 10-17.
  5. Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psy-chology, 21(5), 598-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252
  6. Miles, R. (2023). A OneNote template for knowledge management across a Change Labor-atory project. Bureau de Change Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.21428/3033cbff.0c169411
  7. Moffitt, P., & Bligh, B. (2021). Video and the Pedagogy of Expansive Learning: Insights from a Research-intervention in Engineering Education. In D. Gedera & A. Zalipour (Eds.), Video Pedagogy: Theory and Practice (pp. 123-245). Cham: Springer.
  8. Moffitt, P., & Bligh, B. (2024). Online tasks and students’ transformative agency: Dou-ble-stimulation as a design principle for synchronous online workshops. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 76(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1998792
  9. Nodder, J. (2023). Explaining the principles of Cultural Historical Activity Theory and the Change Laboratory to participants in a research intervention. Bureau de Change La-boratory. https://doi.org/10.21428/3033cbff.51f72007
  10. Obexer, R. (forthcoming). Developing tools for double stimulation in an online Change La-boratory: Design, use and evaluation. To appear in: Bureau de Change Laboratory.
  11. Sannino, A. (2011). Activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory. Theory & Psy-chology, 21(5), 571-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311417485
  12. Sannino, A. (2015). The principle of double stimulation: A path to volitional action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.01.001
  13. Spante, M., Moffitt, P., Bligh, B., Lemonie, Y., Matsmoto, R., Munday, D., … Redmond, F. (2023). Why do an online Change Laboratory? Bureau de Change Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.21428/3033cbff.17652647
  14. Virkkunen, J. & Newnham, C. S. (2013). The Change Laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Sense Publishers.
  15. Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity Systems Analysis and Its Value. In L. C. Yamaga-ta-Lynch (Ed.), Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning en-vironments (Vol. 9, pp. 1–11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6321-5_1