BCL logo

Technical Reports

Vol. 3

Exploring curriculum-industry misalignment via a Change Laboratory in higher vocational health management education: Report on a pilot project

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.82215/9sqqhm85
Submitted
November 5, 2026
Published
2026-11-05

Abstract

This report elaborates on a pilot study that lays the groundwork for a broader doctoral-level research project. The doctoral research investigates the collaborative development of curriculum frameworks for a higher vocational education-based Health Management programme to adapt to the complex and dynamically changing needs of the healthcare industry. Centered on four Change Laboratory workshops held in 2026, this pilot study explores how teachers and students of a higher vocational Health Management programme identify core challenges in the programme, analyse their root causes, and co-create innovative solutions. All participants were recruited from the Health Management programme at a vocational university in Chongqing, China, comprising 11 students, two teachers, and the department’s vice director, with the researcher acting as interventionist. The core aim of this pilot study is to adopt the Change Laboratory methodology to evaluate the design and delivery of workshops for curriculum reform within the Health Management programme. It seeks to generate actionable insights to inform the research methodology to be adopted in the subsequent doctoral research. This pilot study yields two distinct contributions. First, it produces practical insights concerning curriculum design derived from workshop practices and participant feedback, reinforcing the necessity and practical feasibility of a Change Laboratory-based reform process within this pilot institutional context. Second, it generates hands-on experiential knowledge of implementing the Change Laboratory methodology, which offers critical guidance for the main doctoral project from the future researcher-interventionist.

References

  1. Bligh, B. (2023). Designing a Change Laboratory outline plan. Bureau de Change Laboratory, 1, 8. https://doi.org/10.21428/3033cbff.e68b3cb2
  2. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2015). The Change Laboratory in Higher Education: Research Inter-vention Using Activity Theory. In J. Huisman, & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (Vol. 1, pp. 141–168). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220150000001007
  3. Cappelli, P. (2015). Skill gaps, skill shortages, and skill mismatches: Evidence and arguments for the United States. ILR Review, 68(2), 251–290.
  4. CPC Central Committee & State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2016, October 25). Outline of the “Healthy China 2030” Plan. https://english.www.gov.cn/policies/latest_releases/2016/10/25/content_281475475062678.htm
  5. Engeström, Y. (1987/2015). Learning by Expanding (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  6. Engeström, Y., Sannino, A., & Virkkunen, J. (2014). On the methodological demands of formative interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.891868
  7. Guo, Z., & Lamb, S. (2010). International Comparisons of China's Technical and Vocational Education and Training System. Springer Netherlands.
  8. International Labour Organization. (2022). Global Employment Trends for Youth 2022. ILO.
  9. Mourshed, M., Farrell, D., & Barton, D. (2013). Education to Employment: Designing a system that works. McKinsey Center for Government.
  10. OECD. (2010). Learning for Jobs: OECD policy review of vocational education and training. OECD Publishing.
  11. OECD (2014), Skills beyond School: Synthesis Report, OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training. OECD Publishing.
  12. Pilz, M., & Li, J. (Eds.). (2020). Comparative vocational education research: Enduring chal-lenges and new ways forward. Springer.
  13. Sannino, A. (2015). The principle of double stimulation: A path to volitional action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.01.001
  14. Stewart, V. (2015). Made in China: Challenge and innovation in China's vocational education and training system. National Center on Education and the Economy.
  15. Tomlinson, M. (2017). Forms of graduate capital and their relationship to graduate em-ployability. Education + Training, 59(4), 338–352.
  16. UNESCO. (2015). Recommendation concerning technical and vocational education and training (TVET). UNESCO.
  17. Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. S. (2013). The Change Laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-326-3