Male Social Workers In a Female Majority Profession

Authors

  • Alastair Grant Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71957/j27rzk29

Abstract

Social work is long established as a female majority profession, with the ratio of male to female practitioners continuing to widen. There are campaigns to broaden recruitment to better represent the communities' social workers serve, and historically and contemporarily this has included targeting men.

A scoping review was undertaken, the themes of which are discussed, establishing how existing research around gender and masculinity in the social work workforce has focussed on students. However, where recruitment campaigns aim to get more men into the workforce, how do qualified practitioners experience and make sense of masculinity?

This paper introduces an ongoing doctoral research study, using interpretative phenomenological analysis to address the research question ‘how do statutory children and families social workers make sense of expressions of masculinity?’

References

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Brandon, M., Philip, G., & Clifton, J. (2019). Men as Fathers in Child Protection. Australian Social Work, 72(4), 447–460. Academic Search Ultimate.

Christie, A. (1998). Is Social Work a ‘Non-Traditional’ Occupation for Men? British Journal of Social Work, 28(4), 491–510. SocINDEX with Full Text. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011363

Curtis, L., Moriarty, J., & Netten, A. (2010). The Expected Working Life of a Social Worker. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1628–1643. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp039

Daudt, H. M., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48

Department For Education. (2026). Children’s Social Work Workforce, Reporting Year 2025. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/children-s-social-work-workforce/2025

Department For Education. (2026). School workforce in England, reporting year 2025 [Report]. Department For Education. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/school-workforce-in-england/2025

Galley, D. (2020). “Social work is women’s work, right?” Amplifying the voices of male social work students entering into a female majority occupation: Applying qualitative methods. [Doctoral, Bournemouth University]. https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34348/

Hicks, S. (2008). Gender Role Models. . . Who needs ’em?! Qualitative Social Work, 7(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325007086415

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

McPhail, B. A. (2004). Setting the Record Straight: Social Work Is Not a Female-Dominated Profession. Social Work, 49(2), 323–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/49.2.323

Moher, D., Stewart, L., & Shekelle, P. (2015). All in the Family: Systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0163-7

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2025). The NMC register UK mid-year update: 1 April – 30 September 2025 [Report]. Nursing and Midwifery Council. https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/data-reports/september-2025/data-report-uk-web-2025.pdf

Parker, J., & Crabtree, S. A. (2014). Fish Need Bicycles: An Exploration of the Perceptions of Male Social Work Students on a Qualifying Course. British Journal of Social Work, 44(2), 310–327. sih. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs117

Pease, B. (2011). Men in Social Work: Challenging or Reproducing an Unequal Gender Regime? Affilia, 26(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109911428207

Peters, M. D. J. (2016). In no uncertain terms: The importance of a defined objective in scoping reviews. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 14(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2838

Samuel, M. (2023a). Frontline faces tougher targets for qualifying and retaining social workers in new contract. Community Care. https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2023/06/06/frontline-faces-tougher-targets-for-qualifying-and-retaining-social-workers-in-new-contract/

Samuel, M. (2023b, November 1). Fast-track programme to train 320 more social workers in £19m contract extension. Community Care. https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2023/11/01/fast-track-programme-to-train-320-more-social-workers-in-19m-contract-extension/

Schaub, J. H. (2017). Making Sense of Men’s Experiences and Progression Through Social Work Programmes. University of Bath. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bSOC0AEACAAJ

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd edn.). SAGE.

Social Work England. (2024). The Social Work Workforce. Social Work England. https://www.socialworkengland.org.uk/about/publications/the-social-work-workforce/

Stevenson, L. (2018, April 6). Government to spend extra £50 million training 900 social workers on fast-track routes. Community Care. https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2018/04/06/government-spend-extra-50-million-training-900-social-workers-fast-track-routes/

Vicary, S., & Ferguson, G. (2024). Social work using interpretative phenomenological analysis: A methodological approach for practice and research. Open University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-07