Using digital tools: Inclusive assessment as learning

Faye Tucker; Elizabeth Walkden

doi:10.71957/w4ap6959

Authors

Dr Faye Tucker Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4128-4746
Elizabeth Walkden Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University Author https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1760-9528

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71957/w4ap6959

Abstract

to be added

References

Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning Teaching for Constructive Learning. Advanced HE. Available at: Aligning teaching for constructing learning | Advance HE (accessed 12/08/2025)

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.

Carnell, B., & Fung, D. (Eds.). (2017). Developing the higher education curriculum: Research-based education in practice. UCL Press.

CAST (2024) Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. Retrieved August 4, 2025, https://udlguidelines.cast.org

Chin, P. (2016). Peer assessment. New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences, (3), 13–18, https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i3.410

Florian, L (2015) Conceptualising Inclusive Pedagogy: the inclusive pedagogical approach in action in Smith, R., Forlin, C., Deppeler, J., Loreman, T., & Florian, L. Inclusive Pedagogy Across the Curriculum. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.501096

General Medical Council. (2025). Outcomes for Graduates, Plus Supplementary Guidance. Available at: www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/standards-and-outcomes/outcomes-for-graduates (accessed 12/08/2025)

Lancaster University. (2025). Curriculum Design Toolkit. Lancaster University. Available at: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/articulate/CEDA/graduateattributes/#/ (accessed 12/08/2025)

McGhie-Richmond, D. R., & de Bruin, C. (2015). Tablets, tweets and talking text: The role of technology in inclusive pedagogy in Inclusive pedagogy across the curriculum (pp. 211-234). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Morris, C., Milton, E., & Goldstone, R. (2019). Case study: Suggesting choice: Inclusive assessment processes. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 435-447. doi:10.1080/23752696.2019.1669479.

Nicol, D. J. and Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). ‘Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice’, Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp. 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090.

Salmon, G. (2005). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. Routledge.

Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2012). Assessment for learning in higher education. Routledge.

Thomas, L., Jones, R., Ottaway, J. (2015). ‘Effective practice in the design of directed independent learning opportunities’, Higher Education Academy available at: effective_practice_in_the_design_of_directed_independent_learning_opportunities_1568037254.pdf (accessed 12/08/2025)

World Wide Web Consortium. (2024). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. W3C Recommendation 12th December 2024. World Wide Web Consortium. Available at: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 (accessed 12/08/2025)

Using digital tools: Inclusive assessment as learning

Authors

DOI:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License