logo

Editorials

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Debating the status of 'theory' in technology enhanced learning research

Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning: A project of scholarly conversation

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.9611574a
Submitted
7 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

Starting a new academic journal is, at any time and in any academic field, a serious venture: some might say audacious. How will the journal recruit and persuade those with the time and inclination to write for it? Will it find any kind of readership among its target audience? What mechanisms will it use for production, and what effect will those have on how authors publish, and readers access, its content? How will it differentiate itself from other titles in the area?

In this editorial, we seek to address questions of that nature in respect of the new journal Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning.

References

  1. Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing Research Questions: Doing interesting research. Sage.
  2. Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., & Barnes, S. (2009). Technology-Enhanced Learning: A kaleidoscopic view. In N Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-Enhanced Learning: Principles and products (pp. v-xvi). Springer.
  3. Bligh, B., & Lee, K. (2020). Debating the status of ‘theory’ in technology enhanced learning research: Introduction to the Special Inaugural Issue. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1).
  4. Bligh, B., Wiesemes, R., & Murphy, R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on visual learning in higher education. Seminar.net: International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 6(1), 1-6. Retrieved from https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/seminar/article/view/2454/2334 (Last accessed 17 October 2020).
  5. Blunden, A. (2010). An Interdisciplinary Theory of Activity. Brill.
  6. Blunden, A. (2014). Introduction: ‘Collaborative Project’ as a concept for interdisciplinary human science research. In A. Blunden (Ed.), Collaborative Projects: An interdisciplinary study (pp. 1-28). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261228_002
  7. Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.) (2011). Trends in Orchestration: Second Research & Technology Scouting Report. (STELLAR D1.5). https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00722475 (Last accessed 16 October 2020).
  8. Gunn, C., & Steel, C. (2012). Linking theory to practice in learning technology research. Research in Learning Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16148
  9. Hew, K. F., Lan, M., Tang, Y., Jia, C., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Where is the “theory” within the field of educational technology research? British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 956-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12770
  10. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
  11. Perkins, R. A., & Lowenthal, P.R. (2016). Open access journals in educational technology: Results of a survey of experienced users. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2578
  12. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
  13. Selwyn, N. (2011). In praise of pessimism—the need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713-718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01215.x