logo

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Debating the status of 'theory' in technology enhanced learning research

Michel Foucault in technology-enhanced learning: An analytic review of 10 Foucauldian studies on online education

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.82168/pk5f6e20
Submitted
26 July 2026
Published
24-06-2020

Abstract

This paper aims to introduce Foucault’s theoretical ideas to researchers of Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL), particularly researchers who are interested in online educational provisions. This paper explains some of Foucault’s key ideas that may, if rigorously applied, exert disruptive and constructive power on TEL scholarship. The explanation is grounded on the author’s close reading of 10 journal articles that used Foucault’s theory to better understand social subjects and issues related to online education. Using Foucault’s ideas will enable TEL researchers to do the following: 1) to be more critical, challenging taken-for-granted assumptions that often prevent their knowledge progression; 2) to see the big picture, making sense of complex power relations embedded in their practices; and 3) to establish a historical and developmental perspective on the present, which is required to develop a better future. The paper concludes with a rather cautionary comment that researchers must use Foucault’s theory only when it clearly has something to contribute.

References

  1. Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. A. (1991). Postmodern Education: Politics, Culture, and Social Criticism. University of Minnesota Press.
  2. Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power, and education. Routledge.
  3. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. SAGE Publication.
  4. Clapp, A. (2017). An e-Learning Team's Life On and Offline: A Collaborative Self-Ethnography in Postgraduate Education Development. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(1), 33-45.
  5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
  6. Comber, B. (1997). Managerial Discourses: tracking the local effects on teachers' and students’ work in literacy lessons. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 18(3), 389-407. 10.1080/0159630970180305
  7. Coloma, R. S. (2011). Who’s afraid of Foucault? History, theory, and becoming subjects. History of Education Quarterly, 51(2). 184-210.
  8. Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B., & Samuel, S. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Administrative science quarterly, 293-327. 10.2307/2393854
  9. Dean, M. (2010).Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). Sage.
  10. Edwards, R. (1995). Different discourses, discourses of difference: Globalisation, distance education and open learning. Distance Education, 16(2), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791950160206
  11. Fendler, L. (2010). Michel Foucault. Bloomsbury.
  12. Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of knowledge. (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1971).
  13. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Vintage.
  14. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.
  15. Foucault, M. (1984). Of other spaces, heterotopias. Architecture, mouvement, continuité, 5, 46-49.
  16. Foucault, M. (1985). The history of sexuality, Vol. 2: The use of pleasure. (R. Hurley, Trans.). Vintage. (Original work published 1984)
  17. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Univ of Massachusetts Press.
  18. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction, volume I. (R. Hurley, Trans.) Vintage. (Original work published 1976)
  19. Foucault, M. (1991). Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 73-86). University of Chicago Press.
  20. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.) Vintage. (Original work published 1975).
  21. Foucault, M. (2005). The order of things. (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.) Routledge. (Original work published 1966).
  22. Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
  23. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
  24. Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Greenwood Publishing Group.
  25. Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth.
  26. Gourlay, L. (2015). Open education as a ‘heterotopia of desire’. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1029941
  27. Grosz, E. (1995). Space, time and perversion. Routledge.
  28. Knox, J. (2013). Five critiques of the open educational resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 821-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.774354
  29. Koole, M. (2014). Identity and the itinerant online learner. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6), 52-70. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1879
  30. Lee, F. (2008). Technopedagogies of mass‐individualization: correspondence education in the mid twentieth century. History and Technology, 24(3), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341510801900318
  31. Lee, K. (2015). Discourses and realities of online higher education: A history of [discourses of] online education in Canada’s Open University. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto]. Retrieved from https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/77614/
  32. Lee, K. (2018). Discursive effects of a paradigm shift rhetoric in online higher education: Implications on networked learning research and practice. In N.B. Dohn, S. Cranmer, J.A. Sime, M. de Laat, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Networked Learning: Reflections and Challenges. Springer
  33. Lee, K. (2020). Openness and innovation in online higher education: A historical review of the two discourses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1713737
  34. May, R. (1991). The cry for myth. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
  35. Mills, S. (2003). Michel Foucault. Routledge.
  36. Mills, S. (2004). Discourse (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  37. Olssen, M. (2004a). Neoliberalism, globalization, democracy: Challenges for education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2(2), 231-275.
  38. Ouchi, W. G. (1977). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Administrative science quarterly, 95-113. 10.2307/2391748
  39. Ovetz, R. (2017). Click to save and return to course: online education, adjunctification, and the disciplining of academic labour. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 11(1), 48-70. 10.13169/workorgalaboglob.11.1.0048
  40. Peach, H. G. Jr, & Bieber, J. P. (2015). Faculty and online education as a mechanism of power. Distance Education, 36(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019971
  41. Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. Routledge.
  42. Scott, J. (2001). Power. Blackwell.
  43. Stern, D. M. (2011). You had me at Foucault: Living pedagogically in the digital age. Text and Performance Quarterly, 31(3), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2011.573191
  44. Turner, R. L., & Gassaway, C. (2019). Between kudzu and killer apps: Finding human ground between the monoculture of MOOCs and online mechanisms for learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(4), 380-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1465816