logo

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Technology enhanced learning in the MENA region

High School Students’ Experience of a 3D Printing Station at a Bilingual School Makerspace in Kuwait

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.5c7a27a0
Submitted
8 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) printing has become more accessible to school makerspaces (places for making projects using different tools), as prices are dropping and more schools are becoming able to afford 3D printers. Schools in Kuwait need evidence that 3D printing aids education in order to justify purchasing more 3D printers and provide teachers with training to find ways to integrate it into their curricula. This qualitative case study examines 3D printing and the users of this technology so as to better understand 3D printing’s impact on education. It presents the results of a survey asking high school students about the skills they developed during 3D printing projects and field notes collected in a 3D printing station in a school makerspace. I employed two theoretical models to frame this study and enrich the discussion: a 21st-century learning framework and the Dynamic Decision-Making Model. Participants reported that they developed a number of skills during their 3D projects, such as collaboration, communication and technology. Moreover, the author also found a lack of connection between this kind of technology and its instructional value. The issue which was found in this research is that many users of the above-mentioned technology face problems with it because it is still under development.

References

  1. About Us. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.hands-free.health/
  2. Bevan, B., Ryoo, J. J., Vanderwerff, A., Wilkinson, K., & Petrich, M. (2020). “I See Students Differently”: Following the Lead of Maker Educators in Defining What Counts as Learning. Frontiers in Education 5: 121. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.00121
  3. Bodgan, R. C, & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  4. Bridge, C. L. (2019). Examining the Effectiveness of Middle School Students Using iPad Devices for Improving 21st-Century Skills With and Without Four Cs Specific Instruction (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University).
  5. Bull, G., Haj-Hariri, H., Atkins, R., & Moran, P. (2015). An educational framework for digital manufacturing in schools. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2(2), 42-49.
  6. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory; a practical guide through qualitative analysis (1st ed.). California: Sage.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, M.A.: Pearson.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, C.A.: SAGE Publications.
  9. DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interviews.
  10. Durant, K. M. (2016). The maker movement and 3D printing: a critique (Doctoral dissertation, Arts and Letters).‏
  11. Flowers, J. (2019). Using 3D Printers to Engage Students in Research. In Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education (pp. 50-69). IGI Global.‏
  12. Framework for 21st Century Learning. (2021). The Battle for Kids. Retrieved from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf
  13. Ford, S., & Minshall, T. (2019). Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education.‏
  14. Formiga, M. M. M., De Araujo, M. M., & Santos, I. M. (2019). Case Illustrations of 3D Printing in Brazilian Schools and Community. In Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education (pp. 158-175). IGI Global.‏
  15. Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  16. Horton, K. L. (2017). In Their Eyes: A Case Study Describing the Contributions of Making on Teaching and Learning in a Designated Middle School Makerspace (Doctoral dissertation, Drexel University).‏
  17. Huang, T.-C., & Lin, C.-Y. (2017). From 3D modeling to 3D printing: Development of a differentiated spatial ability teaching model. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 604-613. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.10.005
  18. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 K.‏
  19. Kerestes, J. F. (2019). 3D Printed Glitches: Learning From Manufactured Errors. In Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education (pp. 70-93). IGI Global.‏
  20. Kostakis, V., Niaros, V., & Giotitsas, C. (2015). Open source 3D printing as a means of learning: An educational experiment in two high schools in Greece. Telematics and informatics, 32(1), 118-128.‏
  21. Schnedeker, M. (2015). An exploration of introductory training experiences in 3D design and 3D printing (Order No. 1589508). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (1686861123). Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/login/athens?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/docview/1686861123?accountid=11979
  22. Lacy, J. E. (2016). A case study of a high school fab lab. The University of Wisconsin-Madison.‏
  23. Liziero, A. R., & Basniak, M. I. (2019). Using OpenSCAD for Teaching Mathematics: Building an Educational Model for 3D Printing. In Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education (pp. 111-133). IGI Global.‏
  24. Loy, J. (2018). Understanding the Scope for a Product Design Education Discourse on Additive Manufacturing. Archives of Design Research.‏
  25. Loy, J. (2019). 3D Printing Interdisciplinary Learning for Complex Problems. In Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education (pp. 94-109). IGI Global.‏
  26. Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the Maker Movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4.
  27. Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. S. (2013). Invent to learn: Makers in the classroom. The Education Digest, 79(4), 11.‏
  28. Novak, J. I. (2019). Re-educating the Educators: Collaborative 3D Printing Education. In Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education (pp. 28-49). IGI Global.‏
  29. Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  30. Posch, I., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2012, November). First steps in the FabLab: experiences engaging children. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 497-500). ACM.‏
  31. Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Lecture at Pine Cobble School. Retrieved March, 13, 2014.‏
  32. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.‏
  33. Steed, M. B. (2019). Dynamic Decision-Making Model: Integrating 3D Printing in Education. In Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education. IGI Global.
  34. The promise of 3D printing. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.marmoremena.com/the-promise-of-3d-printing/
  35. Trust, T., & Maloy, R. W. (2017). Why 3D print? The 21st-century skills students develop while engaging in 3D printing projects. Computers in the Schools, 34(4), 253-266.‏