Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Technology enhanced learning in the MENA region

Dialogic theorising of Emirati women’s technology enhanced learning in the United Arab Emirates

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.b70d4b5a
Submitted
8 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

This theoretical study develops a dialogic framework to review literature surrounding technology enhanced learning (TEL), in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Dialogism is associated with the works of Russian formalist Mikhail Bakhtin (1895-1975), articulating the multiplicity and intertextuality of voices, perspectives and texts within any given genre or speech act. Dialogism has been developed within the field of critical pedagogy to foster openings for learners and educators’ varying and marginalised positionalities. In this study, the dialogic framework facilitates genre analysis of ten articles, reorientating underpinning assumptions. Findings probe a literary sub-text of non-citizen UAE educators and researchers’ transnational positionalities. Simultaneously, dialogism develops reflexive theorising of Emirati women’s learners who, although the largest group of learners in UAE federal universities, are often absent from the TEL scholarship discussing their learning. Dialogic analysis of the literature reveals the overdetermination of English as a second language, compared to other languages spoken in the UAE; backgrounding of gender issues; proliferation of neoliberal epistemologies and marketized learning. The inquiry concludes that the UAE-TEL genre, in the instance of the reviewed articles, reflects and constitutes gender discrepancies and other hyper-inequalities. Conversely, dialogism facilitates a theoretical awareness of who and what is ‘written-out’ and/or ‘written-in’ and to what effect.

References

  1. Al Hourani, M. (2019). Lived experiences of young Emirati women in the combined family: Extending and rethinking sociological concepts. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 11(3), 27-36. doi: 10.5897/ijsa2019.0807
  2. Ally, M. (2013). Mobile learning: From research to practice to impact education. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 10(2). doi: 10.18538/lthe.v10.n2.140
  3. AlMutawa, R. (2020). Dishdasha blues: Navigating multiple lived experiences in the Gulf. Retrieved 7 January 2021, from https://www.academia.edu/44700965/Dishdasha_Blues_Navigating_Multiple_Lived_Experiences_in_the_Gulf
  4. Alteneiji, E. (2020). Exploring intergenerational value changes across three generations of Emirati women using focused ethnography. Retrieved 6 January 2021, from
  5. Alzeer, G. (2016). Types and dynamics of gendered space: A case of Emirati female learners in a single-gender context. Gender and Education, 1-19. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2016.1205183
  6. Alzeer, G. (2018). Spatializing higher education: Emirati women learners’ hot and cold spaces. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 1-17. doi: 10.1080/09620214.2018.1470021
  7. Bakhtin, M. (1926). Discourse in life and art. Bakhtin School Papers, 5 - 30.
  8. Bakhtin, M. (1984). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  9. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  10. Bakhtin, M. (1999). The problem of speech genres. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland, The discourse reader (pp. 121 - 132). London and New York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group.
  11. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  12. Bligh, B. (2020). Theory disputes and the development of the technology enhanced learning research field. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 115-169. doi: 10.21428/8c225f6e.a85d0cc9
  13. Bligh, B., & Lee, K. (2020). Studies in technology enhanced learning: A project of scholarly conversation. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1-16. doi: 10.21428/8c225f6e.9611574a
  14. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  15. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.
  16. Butler, J. (1993). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.
  17. Carbaugh, D. (1990). Cultural communication and intercultural contact. New York, NY, United States: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. Cavanaugh, C., Hargis, J., Munns, S., & Kamali, T. (2013). iCelebrate teaching and learning: Sharing the iPad experience. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1-12. doi: 10.14434/jotlt.v1n2.2163
  19. Clarke, M. (2018). Global South: what does it mean and why use the term?. Retrieved 21 December 2020, from https://onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca/globalsouthpolitics/2018/08/08/global-south-what-does-it-mean-and-why-use-the-term/
  20. Denzin, N. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research, 1(1), 23-46. doi: 10.1177/146879410100100102
  21. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
  22. Dosekun, S. (2020). Fashioning postfeminism: Spectacular femininities and transnational culture. Urbana, Chicago and Springfield: University of Illinois Press.
  23. Evans, T. (1995). Globalisation, post‐Fordism and open and distance education. Distance Education, 16(2), 256-269. doi: 10.1080/0158791950160207
  24. Flecha, R. (1999). Modern and postmodern racism in Europe: Dialogic approach and anti-racist Pedagogies. Harvard Educational Review, 69(2), 150-172. doi: 10.17763/haer.69.2.3346055q431g2u03
  25. Foucault, M. (1966). The order of things. London: Routledge.
  26. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (11th ed.). London: The Continuum Publishing Company.
  27. Giroux, H. (2014). Neoliberalism's war on higher education. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
  28. GMI. (2021). United Arab Emirates Population Statistics (2021). Retrieved 12 January 2021, from https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/uae-population-statistics/#:~:text=Expatriate%20Population%20of%20the%20UAE,compose%2059.48%25%20of%20the%20population.
  29. Grewal, I. & Kaplan, C. (2006). Scattered hegemonies. Minneapolis, Minn.: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
  30. Gurumurthy, A., & Chami, N. (2017). A feminist action framework on development and digital technologies | Association for Progressive Communications. Retrieved 6 January 2021, from https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/feminist-action-framework-development-and-digital-technologies
  31. Hammond, M., & Wellington, J. (2013). Research methods. London: Routledge.
  32. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press.
  33. Hojeij, Z., & Hurley, Z. (2017). The triple flip: Using technology for peer and self-editing of writing. International Journal for The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1). doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110104
  34. Hooks, b. (2014). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Boston: South End Press.
  35. Hopkyns, S. (2014). The effects of global English on culture and identity in the UAE: a double-edged sword. Retrieved 28 November 2016, from file:///Users/z9667/Downloads/197-818-1-PB%20(1).pdf
  36. Hurley, Z. (2019a). Imagined affordances of Instagram and the fantastical authenticity of Gulf-Arab social media influencers. Social Media + Society, 5 (1).
  37. Hurley, Z. (2019b). Why I no longer believe social media is cool . . . Social Media + Society, 5(3), 205630511984949. doi: 10.1177/2056305119849495
  38. Hurley, Z. (2020a). Postdigital feminism and cultural visual regimes: Covid-19 at Women’s Only University in the Gulf. Postdigital Science and Education. doi: 10.1007/s42438-020-00134-3
  39. Hurley, Z. (2020b). Showing their faces online is difficult for some Arab women: Educators must respond - Al-Fanar Media. Retrieved 7 September 2020, from https://www.al-fanarmedia.org/2020/06/showing-their-faces-online-is-difficult-for-some-arab-women-educators-must-respond/?lbsf=true&id=42206
  40. Kanna, A. (2011). Dubai, the city as corporation. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.
  41. Kanna, A., Le Renard, A., & Vora, N. (2020). Beyond exception: New interpretations of the Arabian Peninsula. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
  42. Kaur-Gill, S., & Dutta, M. (2017). Digital ethnography. Retrieved 24 December 2020, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0271
  43. Khelifa, M. (2012) Trading culture: Have Western-educated Emirati females gone Western? Retrieved from http://www.oidaijsd.com/Files/1-3-2.pdf
  44. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
  45. Lather, P. (2016). Top ten+ list. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 125-131. doi: 10.1177/1532708616634734
  46. Lightfoot, M. (2016). Education technology policies in the Middle East. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  47. Macgilchrist, F. (2018). Cruel optimism in edtech: when the digital data practices of educational technology providers inadvertently hinder educational equity. Learning, Media and Technology, 1-10. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2018.1556217
  48. Massey, D., Goldring, L., & Durand, J. (1994). Continuities in transnational migration: An analysis of nineteen Mexican communities. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1492-1533. doi: 10.1086/230452
  49. McArthur, T. (2004). Is it world or international or global English, and does it matter? English Today, 20(3), 3-15. doi: 10.1017/s0266078404003025
  50. Means, A. (2018). Learning to save the future. New York: Routledge.
  51. Nowicka, M. (2020). (Dis)connecting migration: transnationalism and nationalism beyond connectivity. Comparative migration studies, 8(1). doi: 10.1186/s40878-020-00175-4
  52. Palfreyman, D. (2019). Editor’s introduction: Learning and teaching in higher education, Gulf perspectives. Learning and teaching in higher education, Gulf perspectives, 16(1). Retrieved 8 January 2021, from http://lthe.zu.ac.ae/index.php/lthehome/article/view/346/208
  53. Petrilli, S. (2017). Challenges to living together: Transculturalism, migration, exploitation for a semioethics of human relations. Milan: Mimesis International.
  54. Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies In Education, 16(2), 175-196. doi: 10.1080/0951839032000060635
  55. Santos, I. (2017). Using students’ personal mobile devices in higher education. In L. Menanon & P. Fidalgo, Art and Technology (pp. 59 - 75). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
  56. Tubaishat, A., & Tubaishat, A. (2011). Are students ready to adopt e-learning? A preliminary e-readiness study of a university in the Gulf region. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research, 1(5). Retrieved from http://esjournals.org/journaloftechnology/archive/vol1no5/vol1no5_5.pdf