logo

Articles

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Technology and educational ‘pivoting’ in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic

Perceptions of emergency remote teaching tools used during Covid-19 online teaching by an Israeli English for Academic Purpose (EAP) department

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.53d353b7
Submitted
8 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

The spring 2020 Covid-19 pandemic caused a rapid transition to emergency remote teaching (ERT) in higher education across the world. This study examined teacher and student perceptions on technological tools used for ERT in an Israeli English for Academic Purposes (EAP) department with the aim to reflect and improve the use of these tools in practice in future semesters. Surveys of EAP teachers and students were conducted to examine the perceived effectiveness of technological teaching and communication tools as well as the support the teachers received during ERT. Teachers and students agreed that learning management system (LMS) quizzes and emails were effective learning and communication tools, but differed on the effectiveness of videoconferencing, recorded videos, personal phone calls and text messaging. Teachers felt constant positive support from each other in the EAP department. To improve effectiveness of these technological tools, higher student buy-in of these tools is needed, especially for videoconferencing.

References

  1. Altay, İ. F., & Altay, A. (2019). A Review of Studies on Blended Learning in EFL Environment. International Journal, 125, 140.
  2. Amin, F. M., & Sundari, H. (2020). EFL students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video Conference, LMS, or Messenger Application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362-378.
  3. Avgousti, M. I., & Hadjistassou, S. (2019). ReDesign: Redesigning learning through a new Learning Management System. The EuroCALL Review, 27(1), 48-63.
  4. Bamber, V., Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Knight, P. (2009). Enhancing Learning, Teaching, Assessment And Curriculum In Higher Education. McGraw-Hill Education.
  5. Bao, W. (2020). Covid‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115.
  6. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289.
  7. Binns, C. (2015). What can ‘social practice’ theory and ‘socio-cultural’ theory contribute to our understanding of the processes of module design? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(5), 758-775. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.953462
  8. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
  9. Bower, M. (2016). Deriving a typology of Web 2.0 learning technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 763-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12344
  10. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi.
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  12. Chien, C. W. (2018). Analysis of design and delivery of critical incident workshops for elementary school English as a foreign language teachers in community of practice. Education 3-13, 46(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1163400
  13. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
  14. Consalvo, A. L., Schallert, D. L., & Elias, E. M. (2015). An examination of the construct of legitimate peripheral participation as a theoretical framework in literacy research. Educational Research Review, 16, 1-18.
  15. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education.
  16. Czerniewicz, L., Trotter, H., & Haupt, G. (2019). Online teaching in response to student protests and campus shutdowns: academics’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0170-1
  17. Dashtestani, R. (2014). English as a foreign language—teachers’ perspectives on implementing online instruction in the Iranian EFL context. Research in Learning Technology, 22.
  18. Davies, L., & Bentrovato, D. (2011). Understanding education’s role in fragility: Synthesis of four situational analyses of education and fragility: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Liberia. In: IIEP research papers. Paris, International Institute for Educational Planning.
  19. Denscombe, M. (2010). Good Research Guide: For small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill Education.
  20. Dohaney, J., de Róiste, M., Salmon, R. A., & Sutherland, K. (2020). Benefits, barriers, and incentives for improved resilience to disruption in university teaching. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101691
  21. Gacs, A., Goertler, S., & Spasova, S. (2020). Planned online language education versus crisis-prompted online language teaching: Lessons for the future. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12460
  22. Goodyear, V. A. (2017). Sustained Professional Development on Cooperative Learning: Impact on Six Teachers' Practices and Students' Learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2016.1263381
  23. Harker, M., & Koutsantoni, D. (2005). Can it be as effective? Distance versus blended learning in a web-based EAP programme. ReCALL, 17(2), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834400500042X
  24. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27.
  25. Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2004). A constructive critique of communities of practice: Moving beyond Lave and Wenger. OVAL Research Group, University of Technology Sidney, 11th May.
  26. Huang, M., Shi, Y., & Yang, X. (2020). Emergency remote teaching of English as a foreign language during Covid-19: Perspectives from a university in China.
  27. Jiang, Y., Min, H., Chen, Y., & Gong, Z. (2013). A narrative inquiry into professional identity construction of university EFL teachers in China: A case study of three teachers based in community of practice. 2013 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET 2013.
  28. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
  29. Karen, G. (2019). Understanding primary teachers’ professional learning and practice: an activity theory lens. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(3), 362-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1488997
  30. Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4-29.
  31. Li, N., Marsh, V., & Rienties, B. (2016). Modelling and Managing Learner Satisfaction: Use of Learner Feedback to Enhance Blended and Online Learning Experience. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 216-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12096
  32. Madyarov, I. (2009). Designing a workable framework for evaluating distance language instruction. Calico Journal, 26(2), 290-308.
  33. Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. Routledge.
  34. Quality Course Teaching & Instructional Practice. (2016). In O. L. Consortium (Ed.): Online Learning Consortium.
  35. Rahman, M. S. (2019). Teachers' peer support: difference between perception and practice. Teacher Development, 23(1), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1488765
  36. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263.
  37. Saunders, M., Bamber, R., Trowler, P., & Trowler, P. (2011). Reconceptualising Evaluation In Higher Education: The Practice Turn. McGraw-Hill Education.
  38. Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2020). Covid-19 as an accelerator for digitalization at a German university: Establishing hybrid campuses in times of crisis. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.201
  39. Stanchevici, D., & Siczek, M. (2019). Performance, Interaction, and Satisfaction of Graduate EAP Students in a Face-to-Face and an Online Class: A Comparative Analysis. TESL Canada Journal, 36(3), 132-153.
  40. Stewart, W. H. (2021). A global crash-course in teaching and learning online: A thematic review of empirical Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) studies in higher education during Year 1 of Covid-19. Open Praxis, 13(1), 89-102.
  41. Trowler, P. (2019). Accomplishing change in teaching and learning regimes: Higher education and the practice sensibility. Oxford University Press.
  42. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should Teachers be Trained in Emergency Remote Teaching? Lessons Learned from the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189-199.
  43. Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W. F. (2021). Emergency Remote Teaching During Covid19: The Role of Teachers’ Online Community of Practice (CoP) in Times of Crisis. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1).
  44. Ustunel, E., & Kaplan, A. (2015). English for Academic Purposes Course Evaluation: Suggestions from Students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5, 33-43.
  45. Vorobel, O., & Kim, D. (2012). Language teaching at a distance: An overview of research. Calico Journal, 29(3), 548-562.
  46. Wang, N., Chen, J., Tai, M., & Zhang, J. (2019). Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: learning environment and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1607881
  47. Weisblai, I. (2020). Lemod merachok becherom bet seger mosdot chenouch beakvot hateparztot nagif corona (Emergency Remote Learning during closure of education institution following the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak). Israel. Retrieved from https://fs.knesset.gov.il/globaldocs/MMM/6c81656c-de69-ea11-8113-00155d0af32a/2_6c81656c-de69-ea11-8113-00155d0af32a_11_13773.pdf
  48. Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice: A brief introduction.
  49. Wright, B. M. (2017). Blended learning: Student perception of face-to-face and online EFL lessons. Indonesian journal of applied linguistics, 7(1), 64-71.