logo

Articles

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Technology and educational ‘pivoting’ in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic

Review of a pivoted fully online flipped learning modality to promote reflection for early career teaching staff development

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.079a8e84
Submitted
8 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

The professional development of early career teaching staff (academics and researchers) in learning and teaching practices has attracted significant attention internationally over the past two decades. Institutional agendas, national accreditation and international recognition schemes have been established to provide frameworks for the promotion of effective teaching practices through professional development programmes. Recently, though, the Covid-19 pandemic has challenged the flexibility of staff development frameworks based on how they are administered and the impact that they have on the professional needs of early career teaching staff.

This study takes a critical stance on a face-to-face teaching programme that is pivoted to a fully online flipped modality to accommodate the rapid transition to remote learning and teaching due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The study is written as a case study from a medical school that became fully immersed in a global crisis and took steps to maintain provision in the development of teaching staff at a time when both clinical and teaching roles took precedence and plans for professional development became secondary.

Utilising a combination of asynchronous and synchronous online engagement models, the paper presents a conceptual framework to foster reflective practice and reviews the workflow of promoting flexible engagement and accommodating participant-led development priorities. Analysis of assessment results by comparing pre- and post-pivot participant performances indicate a statistically significant improvement in the flipped learning version of the programme.

Drawing from the theory of situated learning as a tool of investigating professional learning in the context of a developing global crisis, the paper reviews the role of social systems in facilitating flexible learning at a distance through a series of authentic collaborative activities that are designed to support the sharing of practice, promotion of reflection and to inform future approaches to learning and teaching methods.

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
  2. Ajayi, L. (2010). How asynchronous discussion boards mediate learning literacy methods courses to enrich alternative-licensed teachers’ learning experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782559
  3. Brennan, L. (2005). Integrating work based learning into higher education: A guide to good practice. University Vocational Awards Council. http://www.voced.edu.au/node/20126
  4. Brookfield, S. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  5. Carlile, P. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.
  6. Chiou, H. H. (2020). The impact of situated learning activities on technology university students’ learning outcome. Education and Training, 63(3), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2018-0092
  7. Clegg, S. (2009). Forms of knowing and academic development practice. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902771937
  8. Cornish, L., & Jenkins, K. A. (2012). Encouraging teacher development through embedding reflective practice in assessment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2012.669825
  9. Correia, A.-P. (2020). Healing the digital divide during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 21(1), 13–21.
  10. Farrell, B., Jennings, B., Ward, N., Marks, P. Z., Kennie, N., Dolovich, L., Jorgenson, D., Jones, C., & Gubbels, A. (2013). Evaluation of a pilot e-learning primary health care skills training program for pharmacists. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 5(6), 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2013.07.005
  11. Hew, K. F., Jia, C., Gonda, D. E., & Bai, S. (2020). Transitioning to the “new normal” of learning in unpredictable times: Pedagogical practices and learning performance in fully online flipped classrooms. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00234-x
  12. Kahn, P., Young, R., Grace, S., Pilkington, R., Rush, L., Tomkinson, B., & Willis, I. (2006). The role and effectiveness of reflective practices in programmes for new academic staff: A grounded practitioner review of the research literature. In The Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/role-and-effectiveness-reflective-practices-programmes-new-academic-staff
  13. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Source: The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1183338
  14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Matthews, K. E., Lodge, J. M., & Bosanquet, A. (2014). Early career academic perceptions, attitudes and professional development activities: Questioning the teaching and research gap to further academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.724421
  16. Ng, S. L., Kinsella, E. A., Friesen, F., & Hodges, B. (2015). Reclaiming a theoretical orientation to reflection in medical education research: A critical narrative review. Medical Education, 49(5), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12680
  17. Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: For active, effective and increased learning – especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z
  18. O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C., Karanicolas, S., Snelling, C., & Winning, T. (2015). Erratum: The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review (The Internet and Higher Education (2015) 25 (85-95)). Internet and Higher Education, 27, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.05.001
  19. Pittman, J., Severino, L., Decarlo-Tecce, M. J., & Kiosoglous, C. (2021). An action research case study: Digital equity and educational inclusion during an emergent COVID-19 divide. Journal for Multicultural Education, 15(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-09-2020-0099
  20. Ray, M. E., Daugherty, K. K., Lebovitz, L., Rudolph, M. J., Shuford, V. P., & DiVall, M. V. (2018). Best practices on examination construction, administration, and feedback. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(10), 1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.5688/AJPE7066
  21. Shaw, R. (2018). Professionalising teaching in HE: The impact of an institutional fellowship scheme in the UK. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1336750
  22. Simkins, S., & Maier, M. (2010). Just-in-time teaching: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  23. Simpson, D., Fincher, R. M. E., Hafler, J. P., Irby, D. M., Richards, B. F., Rosenfeld, G. C., & Viggiano, T. R. (2007). Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship. Medical Education, 41(10), 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02844.x
  24. Smith, D. (2020). The Covid-19 crisis and academic development: Reflections on running a staff development webinar series for Politics/IR academics. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 5(1), 130–135.
  25. Stöhr, C., Demazière, C., & Adawi, T. (2020). The polarizing effect of the online flipped classroom. Computers and Education, 147, 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2019.103789
  26. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
  27. Sutherland, K., & Taylor, L. (2011). The development of identity, agency and community in the early stages of the academic career. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(3), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.596698
  28. Tuffnell, C. (2021). Faculty learning communities: Supporting the development of online educators. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.21428/8C225F6E.2191C396