Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Autoethnography in online doctoral education

Embracing humanities in computer science: An autoethnography

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.d562588b
Submitted
9 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

Humanities enrolment in higher educational institutions across the globe has been falling considerably in favour of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) careers, like Computer Science. While students eagerly pursue these disciplines, in doing so, they have simultaneously lost the possible grounding Humanities can provide in contextualising their knowledge. The overall purpose of this study is to use my unique perspective as a student of both disciplines to show the value Humanities can bring to the field of Computer Science and make a case for the need of an interdisciplinary approach for these seemingly unrelated disciplines. Because the study uses my experience as the basis for making this case, the research methodology used was an Autoethnography. The data was sourced from my own recorded self-reflective narratives and supported with my assignment feedback forms, assignments and excavation log. The findings were coded and organised by emergent themes which were then analysed using the interdisciplinary knowledge integration theory. The results show that while Humanities and Computer Science have a polarised approach to methodologies and perspectives that makes it particularly challenging for the integration of knowledge, it does provide significant competencies that can transfer and transform the learning experience and skills of students. These include communication, critical thinking, adaptability, and self-learning skills. It is for these uncovered benefits to students’ development that institutions should consider an interdisciplinary approach to higher education.

References

  1. Adams, T. E., Ellis, C., & Jones, S. H. (2014). Autoethnography. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
  2. Barkatas, T., Carr, N., & Cooper , G. (2018). STEM Education: An Emergency Field of Inquiry. Brill Sense.
  3. Bear, A., & Skorton, D. (2019). The world need students with interdisciplinary education. Issues in Science and Technology, 60-62.
  4. Benson, T. (1982). Five Arguments Against Interdisciplinary Studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 38-48.
  5. Berube, M., & Ruth, J. (2015). The Humanities, Higher Education & Academic Freedom: Three Necessary Arguments. Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Buchbinder, S. B., Alt, P. M., Eskow, K., Forbes , W., Hester , E., Struck, M., & Taylor, D. (2005). Creating Learning Prisms with an Interdisciplinary Case Study Workshop. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 257 - 274.
  7. Burton, S. (2018, May 31). Coding Skills won't save your job - but humanities will. Retrieved from Market Watch : https://www.marketwatch.com/story/coding-skills-wont-save-your-job-but-the-humanities-will-2018-05-17
  8. Butz, D., & Besio, K. (2009). Autoethnography. Geography Compass, 1660-1674.
  9. Caudill, L., Hill, A., Hoke, K., & Lipan, O. (2010). Impact of Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research in Mathematics and Biology on the Development of a New Course Integrating Five STEM Disciplnes. Life Sciences Education, 212-216.
  10. Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as a method. London: Routledge.
  11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
  12. Davies, M., & Devlin, M. (2007). Interdisciplinary Higher Education: Implications for Teaching and Learning. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
  13. Denning, P. J. (1999). Computer Science: The Discipline. In A. Ralston, & D. Hemmendinger, Encyclopedia of Computer Science.
  14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. London: SAGE.
  15. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoehtnography: An overview. Historical Social Research, 36, 272 - 290.
  16. Hayward, B. (2014). Stanford to offer new undergraduate majors integrating humanities, computer science. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/march/facsen-joint-majors-030614.html
  17. Heikkinen, K.-P., & Raisanen, T. (2018). Role of Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Education in Computer Science: A Literature Review. Managing Global Transitions, 159-172.
  18. Hopcroft, J. E. (1987). Computer Science: The Emergence of a Discipline. Communications of the ACM, 198-202.
  19. Ikype, I. B. (2015). The Decline of the Humanities and the Decline of Society. Theoria, 50-66.
  20. Kali, Y., & Kidron, A. (2015). Boundary Breaking for Interdisciplinary Learning. Research in Learning Technology.
  21. Khalid, A., Chin, C. A., Atiqullah, M. M., Sweigart, J. F., Shutzmann, B., & Zhou, W. (2013). Building a Bettwe Engineer: The Importance of Humanities and Engineering. 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.
  22. Klaassen, R. G. (2018). Interdisciplinary Eduation: A Case Study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 842-859.
  23. Koch, C. (1991). On the benefits of Interrelating Computer Science and the Humanities: The Case of Metaphor. Computers and the Humanities, 25, 289-295.
  24. Lattuca, L. R., Voight, L. J., & Fath, K. Q. (2004). Does Interdisciplinarity Promote Learning? Theoretical Support and Researchable Questions. The Review of Higher Education, 28, 23-48.
  25. Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country ComparisonL International Comparisons of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Australian Council of Learned Activities.
  26. Medeiros, R. P., Ramalho, G. L., & Falcao, T. P. (2019). A Systematic Literature Review of Teaching and Learning Introductory Porgramming in Higher Education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 77-89.
  27. Microsoft Coporation. (2008). The Future Computed: Artificial Intelligence and its role in society. Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Corporation.
  28. Miller, R. C. (1982). Varieties of Interdisciplinary Approaches in the Social Sciences. Issues in Integrative Studies, 1-37.
  29. Newell, W. H. (1983). The Case for Interdisciplinary Studies: Response to Professor Benson's Five Arguments. Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  30. Nissani, M. (1997). Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinarity: The Case for Interdisciplinary Knowledge and Research. The Social Science Journal, 201-216.
  31. Quick, M. (2018, October 16). Interdisciplinary Teaching Grant Program. Retrieved April 2019, from University of Southern California: https://www.provost.usc.edu/interdisciplinary-teaching-grant-program/
  32. Regli, W. (2017). Viewpoint Wanted: Toolsmiths. Seeking to use software, hardware, and algorithmic ingenuity to create unique domain-independent instruments. Communications of the ACM, 60, 26-28.
  33. Repko, A. F., & Szostak, R. (2017). Interdisiplinary Research: Process and Theory (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications Inc. .
  34. Shen, J., Liu, L. O., & Sung, S. (2014). Designing Interdisciplinary Assessments in Sciences for College Students: An Example on Osmosis. International Journal of Science Education, 1773-1793.
  35. Skorton, D. (2018). Branches from the same tree: The case for integration in higher education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1865-1869.
  36. Tadmor, B., & Tidor, B. (2005). Interdisciplinary Research and Education at teh Biology-Engineering-Computer Science Interface: A Perspective. Drug Disovery Today, 1706-1712.
  37. Tarrant, S. P., & Thiele, L. P. (2017). Enhancing the promoting interdisciplinarity in higher education. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 7, 355-360.
  38. What is Computer Science? (n.d.). Retrieved from University of York: https://www.cs.york.ac.uk/undergraduate/what-is-cs/
  39. White, D. (2014). What is STEM education and Why is it Important? Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal, 1-9.
  40. You, S. S. (2017). Why Teaching Science with an Interdisicplinary Approach: History, Trends and Conceptual Frameworks. Journal of Education and Learning, 66-77.
  41. Yu, K., & Pillay, V. (2011). Tracking Enrolments and Graduations in Humanities Education in South Africa: Are we in a crisis? South African Journal of Higher Education, 1218-1231.