logo

Articles

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Autoethnography in online doctoral education

Learning to “see” again: Overcoming challenges while teaching English to visually-impaired students

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.b71fdd12
Submitted
9 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

This study aims to determine the pedagogical and emotional challenges and the teaching strategies implemented in face-to-face complementary tutorial sessions requested by visually-impaired students (VIS) learning English as a foreign language in a virtual undergraduate course whose graphic nature diminishes their opportunities. The research methodology selected for this purpose is an evocative autoethnography in which self-observation, self-reflection, and field notes were used for the data collection needed. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative codes for this collection under three main themes: pedagogical and emotional challenges and teaching strategies. The findings revealed how pedagogical challenges derived from emotional challenges, a great sense of affective scaffolding to respond to neglected VIS’ needs and concerns attached to materials adaptation, web accessibility issues, and a redefinition of inclusion policies in higher education. A final reflection on the implications of current language teaching that might work for VIS and teacher’s training is made in addition to the limitations encountered.

References

  1. Abeele, M. V., De Cock, R. & Roe, K. (2012). Blind faith in the web? Internet use and empowerment among visually and hearing-impaired adults: A qualitative study of benefits and barriers. Communications-The European Journal of Communication Research, 37(2), 129-151.
  2. Adam, A.& Kreps, D. (2006). Enabling or disabling technologies? A critical approach to web accessibility. Information Technology & People.
  3. Başaran, S. (2012). Teaching English to visually-impaired students in Turkey: A case study. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B. Social and Educational Studies, Special Issue 2, 217-226.
  4. Boekaerts, M. (2007). Understanding students' affective processes in the classroom. In Emotion in education (pp. 37-56). Academic Press.
  5. Bohman, J (2005). Critical Theory. The Stanford encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2005 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2005/entries/critical-theory/
  6. Brown H. D. (2003). Teaching by Principles an interactive approach to language pedagogy. San Francisco: Longman.
  7. Burgstahler, S. (2009). Universal Design of Instruction (UDI): Definition, Principles, Guidelines, and Examples. Do-It.
  8. Carter, R., Nunan, D& Credo. R (2011). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Coşkun, A. (2013). English language teaching for the visually-impaired learners: Training non-native English teachers. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 4(1), 289.
  10. Denzin, N. K. 1997. Interpretive ethnography: ethnographic practices for the twenty-first century. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  11. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Rowman Altamira.
  12. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E.& Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: an overview. Historical social research/Historische sozialforschung, 273-290.
  13. Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. (1996). Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  14. Gindis, B. (1990). Vygotsky’s vision. Reshaping the practice of special education for the 21st century. Remedial and Special Education, 20(6).
  15. Hagan, F. (2005). Reflections on teaching mathematics in an exam-driven school: An autoethnography. In Building connections: Theory, research, and practice. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 401-407). Sydney: MERGA.
  16. Hall, M. C. (2019). Critical disability theory.
  17. Hanzálková, J. (2006). Materials, equipment, and procedures available for teaching English to blind students. Master’s thesis, Masaryk University, Faculty of Arts.
  18. Harper, S.& Yesilada, Y. (Eds.). (2008). Web accessibility: a foundation for research. Springer Science & Business Media.
  19. Intarapanich, C. (2013). Teaching methods, approaches and strategies found in EFL classrooms: A case study in Lao PDR. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88, 306-311.
  20. Jedynak, M. (2018). Teaching a Foreign Language to Partially Sighted and Blind Learners: Overview of Research Findings. ISSN 2300-391X, 199. doi.org/10.14746/ikps.2018.21.11
  21. Kanno, Y.& Norton, B. (2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities: Introduction. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2(4), 241-249.
  22. Kaveh, M. Y. (2012). Autoethnography [An unpublished manuscript]. Gorham, ME: USM
  23. Khalilova, N. (2021). Situational Language Teaching (Oral Approach). In Образование, Воспитание И Педагогика: Традиции, Опыт, Инновации (pp. 18-21).
  24. Khan, A., Khusro, S.& Alam, I. (2018). Blindsense: An accessibility-inclusive universal user interface for blind people. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 8(2), 2775-2784.
  25. Kocyigit, N.& Artar, P. S. (2015). A challenge: Teaching English to visually-impaired learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 689-694.
  26. Lake, J. (2015). Autoethnography and reflective practice: Reconstructing the doctoral thesis experience. Reflective Practice, 16(5), 677-687
  27. Lapidus, A., Kaveh, Y. M.& Hirano, M. (2013). ESL teachers/ESL students: Looking at autoethnography through the lens of personetics. L2 Journal, 5(1).
  28. Lead, S. J., Legge, G. E.& Bullimore, M. A. (1999). What is low vision. Optometry and Vision Science, 76, 198-211.
  29. Lewin-Jones, J.& Hodgson, J. (2004). Differentiation strategies relating to the inclusion of a student with a severe visual impairment in higher education (modern foreign languages). The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 22(1), 32–36. https://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/paper/2724.html
  30. Lund, B.& Chemi, T. (Eds.). (2015). Dealing with emotions: A pedagogical challenge to innovative learning. Springer.
  31. Mei, Y. (2018). Comments on the Audiolingual Method. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 7(4), 90.
  32. Melie, S., William, G., Susanto, S.& Nanda, D. S. (2020). Foreign language training for visually-impaired students in Southeast Asian countries.
  33. Monbeck,M.E. (1996) The Meaning of Blindness (Attitudes Toward Blindness and Blind People). Indiana University Press, London.
  34. Moser, I. (2006). Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment with an order of the normal. Information, Communication, and Society, 9(3),373–395.
  35. Myers, K. A., Spudich, C., Spudich, D.& Laux, S. E. (2012). Saving face: Inclusive communication with college students with disabilities using politeness and face-negotiation. Journal of Diversity Management (JDM), 7(2), 97-108.
  36. Nikolic, T. (1987). Teaching a foreign language in schools for blind and visually-impaired children. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 81(2), 62–66.
  37. Olivares, J. (2020). The Enhancement of English Speaking Ability of The Visually Impaired Students Using Blended Learning. วารสาร วิชาการ มหาวิทยาลัย ราชภัฏ อุดรธานี, 8(1), 56-56.
  38. Orsini‐Jones, M. A. R. I. N. A. (2009). Measures for inclusion: Coping with the challenge of visual impairment and blindness in university undergraduate level language learning. Support for Learning, 24(1), 27-34.
  39. Ovando, C., Combs, M. and Collier, V. (2006). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: Teaching in multicultural contexts (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  40. Oviedo-Cáceres, M. D. P., Arias-Pineda, K. N., Yepes-Camacho, M. D. R., Montoya Falla, P.& Guisasola Valencia, L. (2021). “My disability does immeasure me: it is a way of living and being in the world” meanings of social inclusion from the perspective of people with visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 02646196211036403.
  41. Paciello, M. (2000). Web accessibility for people with disabilities. CRC Press.
  42. Pelias, R. J. (2003). The academic tourist: An autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 369-373.
  43. Porayska-Pomsta, K.& Pain, H. (2004, August). Providing cognitive and affective scaffolding through teaching strategies: applying linguistic politeness to the educational context. In International conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 77-86). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
  44. Rose, D. H.& Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  45. Rotatori, A. F., Bakken, J. P.& Obiakor, F. E. (2011). History of Special Education. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
  46. Roth, W. M. (2009). Auto/ethnography and the question of ethics. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 10, No. 1).
  47. Rutter, R., Lauke, P. H., Waddell, C., Thatcher, J., Henry, S. L., Lawson, B., ... & Urban, M. (2007). Web accessibility: Web standards and regulatory compliance. Press.
  48. Sapp W. (2009). Universal Design: Online Educational Media for Students with Disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(8):495-500. doi:10.1177/0145482X0910300807
  49. Setyawati, N. M. Y., Adnyani, L. D. S.& Piscayanti, K. S. (2018). The Analysis of efl-learning strategy of the visually-impaired junior high school students in slb negeri 1 denpasar. Prasi: Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 13(02), 77-86.
  50. Sharma, M. (2019). Approaches and Methods of Teaching English as a Second Language: A Historical Perspective. IJRAR- International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6 (1), 381-387.
  51. Snyder, T.& Kesselman, M. (1972). Teaching English as a second language to blind people. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 66(6), 161-166.
  52. Stendal, K. (2012) How do people with Disability Use and Experience Virtual Worlds and ICT: A Literature Review. Journal of Virtual World Research, 5(1), 1-17.
  53. Stuckey,K.A. (1993) Aids and Appliances for the Blind. Topical Time, 44(1), 25-27
  54. Susanto, S.& Nanda, D. S. (2018). Teaching and learning English for visually-impaired students: an ethnographic case study. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(1), 83-92.
  55. Torres Chaparro, S. P. (2016) Teaching English as a foreign language to an a1 blind student: Strategies and challenges for mainstream teachers (Master's thesis, Universidad de La Sabana).
  56. Ullah, M. S. (2020). ICTs, power prejudice and empowerment: Digital exclusion of the poor in rural Bangladesh. In Digital inequalities in the global south (pp. 103-133). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  57. Vygotsky, L.S. (1983). Sobraniye Sochinenii [Collected Works], Vol. 5, Moscow, Pedagogika Publishers.
  58. Wang, Y. (2009). Impact of Lev Vygotsky on special education/ L'influence de Vygotsky sur l'education special. Canadian Social Science, (5), 100.
  59. Waterstone, M. E. (2014). Disabilities Constitutional Law. Emory Law Journal, 63(3), 527-580.