logo

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Teaching practices in times of digital transformation

Two modes of feedback are better than one: Educator experiences of providing audio feedback on student work

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.70898b2c
Submitted
10 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

The integration of digital teaching and learning practices can contribute to the organisational change required by the higher education digital transformation agenda. One such digital practice, audio feedback, is claimed to be more efficient and engaging than written comments. A substantial body of empirical research in this area evaluates student satisfaction, impact on student performance, and time efficiencies for tutors. What remains to be usefully investigated is tutors’ experiences with providing audio feedback and its impact on tutors’ pedagogical processes and practices. To address the identified gap in literature, thus, an online tutor, the author of this article, conducted a collaborative practitioner research project with three other online tutors to use an audio feedback function for their module assignment marking. Qualitative data were collected through tutors’ reflective journals and a group discussion to gain insights into their experiences. Findings suggest that the production of audio feedback is the culmination of a complex process involving both written and spoken stages and has the potential to address pedagogic concerns and communicate authentically with students, but requires additional time and cognitive processing. Implications for the potential contributions of the practice to the broader digital transformation vision are discussed.

References

  1. Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M.-D., Infante-Moro, J. C., & García, G. R. (2020). Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: Global research trends. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 12(5), 2107. doi:10.3390/su12052107
  2. Akour, M., & Alenezi, M. (2022). Higher Education Future in the Era of Digital Transformation. Education Sciences, 12(11), 784. doi:10.3390/educsci12110784
  3. Alharbi, M. A., & Alghammas, A. (2021). Teacher Written vs. Audio Feedback on Undergraduates’ Written Assignments. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(12), 1562-1570. doi:10.17507/tpls.1112.08
  4. Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical strategies. London: London: SAGE.
  5. Benavides, L. M. C., Arias, J. A. T., Serna, M. D. A., Bedoya, J. W. B., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 20(11), 1-23. doi:10.3390/s20113291
  6. Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-20. doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
  7. Brearley, F. Q., & Cullen, W. R. (2012). Providing Students with Formative Audio Feedback. Bioscience Education, 20, 22-36.
  8. British Educational Research Association. (2011). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research.
  9. Cann, A. (2014). Engaging Students with Audio Feedback. Bioscience Education Electronic Journal, 22(1), 31.
  10. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2004). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. Routledge.
  11. Carruthers, C., McCarron, B., Bolan, P., Devine, A., McMahon-Beattie, U., & Burns, A. (2015). ‘I like the sound of that’–an evaluation of providing audio feedback via the virtual learning environment for summative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 352-370.
  12. Cavanaugh, A., & Song, L. (2015). Audio and Written Comments in an Online Undergraduate Composition Class: Student and Instructor Approaches and Preferences. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(4), 248-259. doi:10.1080/08923647.2015.1085754
  13. Chew, E. (2014). ‘To listen or to read?’ Audio or written assessment feedback for international students in the UK. On the Horizon, 22(2), 127-135.
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
  15. Dagen, A. S., Mader, C., Rinehart, S., & Ice, P. (2008). Can you hear me now? Providing feedback using audio commenting technology. College Reading Association Yearbook, 29, 152-166.
  16. Evans, C. (2013). Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120. doi:10.3102/0034654312474350
  17. Facer, K., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Digital technology and the futures of education – towards ‘non-stupid’ optimism. In Paper commissioned for the UNESCO Futures of Education report (forthcoming, 2021). UNESCO.
  18. Garrison, D., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  19. Gonzalez, M., & Moore, N. S. (2018). Supporting Graduate Student Writers With VoiceThread. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1-20. doi:10.1177/0047239517749245
  20. Gould, J., & Day, P. (2013). Hearing you loud and clear: student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 554-566. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.660131
  21. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
  22. Heimbürger, A. I., & Isomöttönen, V. (2017). Moderating Cultural Effects in a Higher e-Education Context?: Supervisor’s Tone of Voice in Recorded Audio Feedback. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, USA. https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/56766
  23. Hennessy, C., & Forrester, G. (2014). Developing a framework for effective audio feedback: a case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 777-789.
  24. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using Asynchronous Audio Feedback to Enhance Teaching Presence and Students’ Sense of Community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25. Available from: http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v11n2/using-asynchronous-audio-feedback-enhance-teaching-presence-and-students%E2%80%99-sense-community
  25. Jackson, N. C. (2019). Managing for competency with innovation it change in higher education: Examining the pitfalls and pivots of digital transformation. Business Horizons, 62(6), 761-772. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.002
  26. Jisc. (2020, 4 November). What is digital transformation? Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/digital-strategy-framework-for-university-leaders/what-is-digital-transformation
  27. Johnson, G. M., & Cooke, A. (2016). Self-regulation of learning and preference for written versus audio-recorded feedback by distance education students. Distance Education, 37(1), 107-120. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1081737
  28. Jonsson, A. (2012). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63-76. doi:10.1177/1469787412467125
  29. King, D., McGugan, S., & Bunyan, N. (2008). Does it makes a difference? replacing text with audio feedback. 3. doi:http://community.dur.ac.uk/pestlhe.learning/ojs/index.php/pestlhe/article/view/136
  30. Knauf, H. (2016). Reading, Listening and Feeling: Audio Feedback as a Component of an Inclusive Learning Culture at Universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 442-449. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1021664
  31. Lunt, T., & Curran, J. (2010). ‘Are you listening please?’ The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), 759.
  32. Macgregor, G., Spiers, A., & Taylor, C. (2011). Exploratory Evaluation of Audio Email Technology in Formative Assessment Feedback. Research in Learning Technology, 19(1), 39-59. doi:10.1080/09687769.2010.547930
  33. McCarthy, J. (2015). Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues in Educational Research(2), 153.
  34. Merry, S., & Orsmond, P. (2008). Students’ Attitudes to and Usage of Academic Feedback Provided Via Audio Files. Bioscience Education, 11(1), 1-11. doi:10.3108/beej.11.3
  35. Middleton, A., & Nortcliffe, A. (2010). Audio feedback design: principles and emerging practice. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 20(2), 208-223. doi:10.1504/IJCEELL.2010.036816
  36. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171-3195. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
  37. Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. Abingdon: Routledge.
  38. Morris, C., & Chikwa, G. (2016). Audio versus written feedback: Exploring learners’ preference and the impact of feedback format on students’ academic performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 125-137.
  39. Munro, W., & Hollingworth, L. (2014). Audio Feedback to Physiotherapy Students for Viva Voce: How Effective Is The Living Voice? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 865-878. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.873387
  40. Oliveira, K. K. d. S., & de Souza, R. A. C. (2022). Digital Transformation towards Education 4.0. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 283. doi:10.15388/infedu.2022.13
  41. Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2017). ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 499-516. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500
  42. Renzella, J., & Cain, A. (2020, 27 June - 19 July). Enriching Programming Student Feedback with Audio Comments. Paper presented at the 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), Seoul South Korea.
  43. Rodway-Dyer, S., Knight, J., & Dunne, E. (2011). A case study on audio feedback with geography undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(2), 217-231.
  44. Rotheram, B. (2009). Sounds Good: Quicker, better assessment using audio feedback. Retrieved from http://www.soundsgood.org.uk/
  45. Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015
  46. Voelkel, S., & Mello, L. V. (2014). Audio Feedback – Better Feedback? Bioscience Education E-journal: BEE-j., 22(1), 16-30.