Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Teaching practices in times of digital transformation

Digital transformation of post-pandemic learning and teaching: Utilising TPACK to support educator development in a flipped learning pilot

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.6f043b79
Submitted
11 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

As higher education looks to continue on its path of digital transformation to support pedagogical approaches such as online and blended learning, lessons must be taken from the emergency distance learning response, during Covid-19, and steps implemented to move towards a more thoughtfully designed strategic approach to digital education.

This case study examines an Australian university’s global campus in the United Arab Emirates, a traditionally teacher-led institution, that aims to address ‘what’ post-pandemic education will look like by articulating an approach to the digital transformation of learning and teaching, specifically related to educator professional development. The specific focus of this research considers the ‘how’ by proposing a Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework to guide the learning design of a faculty training pilot that supports educators in the development and implementation of a specific pedagogical model, namely flipped learning.
The TPACK framework was used to inform the design of the flipped learning faculty training pilot and was used in the analysis coding of participants’ feedback to determine what domains of knowledge were touched and what domains require further attention.

The study found that the TPACK framework can be a useful learning design tool for the development of faculty training programs that look to digitally transform learning and teaching, however, while the framework prompts explicit consideration of pedagogical and technological knowledge development, it can be found lacking in the fostering of community elements for a more impactful approach. The author believes this study will provide valuable insight for researchers and policymakers concerned with the digital transformation of learning and teaching in the post-pandemic higher educational landscape, specifically those interested in the development of teaching practice for blended learning approaches.

References

  1. Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
  2. Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782539
  3. Aristeidou, M., & Cross, S. (2021). Disrupted distance learning: the impact of Covid-19 on study habits of distance learning university students. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(3), 263-282.
  4. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. International Society for Technology in Education.
  5. Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creating learning and teaching: Towards relational pedagogy in higher education (1st ed.). Critical Publishing.
  6. Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466-487.
  7. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.
  8. Clay, J. (2020). Blended learning in higher education. Jisc. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/blended-learning-in-higher-education
  9. Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472.
  10. Gao, P., & Mager, G. (2013). Constructing embodied understanding of technological pedagogical content knowledge: Preservice teachers' learning to teach with information technology. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 74-92. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.052023
  11. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.
  12. Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229.
  13. Hrastinski, S. (2020). Informed design for learning with digital technologies. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1801637
  14. Huber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020). COVID-19 and schooling: evaluation, assessment and accountability in times of crises—reacting quickly to explore key issues for policy, practice and research with the school barometer. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32, 237-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09325-5
  15. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2007). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(1), 60-70.
  16. Kurt, S. (2018). TPACK: Technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Educational Technology, 58(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0111-7
  17. Lazar, I. M., Panisoara, G., & Panisoara, I. O. (2020). Digital technology adoption scale in the blended learning context in higher education: Development, validation and testing of a specific tool. PloS One, 15(7), e0235957.
  18. Mahlow, C., & Hediger, A. (2019). Digital Transformation in Higher Education-Buzzword or Opportunity?. eLearn Magazine, 2019(5), 13.
  19. McMurtrie, B. (2023, January 5). Teaching: Will ChatGPT change the way you teach?. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/newsletter/teaching/2023-01-05
  20. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation. Wiley.
  21. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  22. Mladenova, T., Kalmukov, Y., & Valova, I. (2020). Covid 19 – A Major Cause of Digital Transformation in Education or Just an Evaluation Test. TEM Journal, 1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem93-42
  23. Oliveira, K. K. D. S., & de Souza, R. A. (2022). Digital transformation towards education 4.0. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 283-309. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2022.16
  24. Papanikolaou, K., Makri, K., & Roussos, P. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0044-1
  25. Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage.
  26. Reidsema, C., Hadgraft, R., & Kavanagh, L. (2017). Introduction to the flipped classroom. In The Flipped Classroom (pp. 3-14). Springer.
  27. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
  28. Sahin, M., & Kurban, C. F. (2016). The flipped approach to higher education: Designing universities for today’s knowledge economies and societies. Emerald Group Publishing.
  29. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
  30. Talbert, R. (2017). Flipped learning: A guide for higher education faculty. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  31. Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal of E-learning, 6(1), 81-94.