Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): Parents/guardians, education and digital technologies

Experiences of parents of pre-primary students on teaching and learning practices using technology during Covid-19

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.f1aeb9bc
Submitted
12 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

This research study explores parents’ experiences teaching their pre-primary children using technology during the Covid-19 pandemic, explicitly focusing on parents from rural India. The study adopts a phenomenological qualitative research design to understand the participants’ lived experiences. The research methodology includes open-ended and closed-ended questions in the interview to gather rich and in-depth data from the participants. A sample of 15 parents of pre-primary students aged between three to five years who met the selection criteria of being parents of students enrolled in rural schools in India were selected for the study. The questions gathered detailed and descriptive information about parents’ experiences of pre-primary students regarding the change in teaching and learning practices imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic, specifically in rural India. The study identified several benefits the parents derived from indulging themselves in their children’s teaching and learning during the pandemic. I also explore how the parents managed their overlapping roles (parenting versus teaching facilitator) during the lockdown and how technology aided this process. Investigating the questions enabled me to interpret the sustainability imperative of technology adoption in teaching and learning practice. The digital practices and their sustainability in education need to be understood in detail in the context of the digital competency of the users and the digital infrastructure available to them, especially in rural India. Further, study findings are expected to form an empirical base for future policies addressing the digital and education divide.

References

  1. Alharthi, M. (2022). Parental Involvement in Children’s Online Education During COVID-19: A Phenomenological Study in Saudi Arabia. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1–15. Advance aonline publication accessible at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01286-y
  2. ASER Centre. (2020). Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) 2020 Wave 1 (1st ed., Vol. 1, Ser. 1). ASER.
  3. Azim Premji Foundation. (2020). Myths of Online Education. Azim Premji University, Bangalore.
  4. Bhamani, S., Makhdoom, A. Z., Bharuchi, V., Ali, N., Kaleem, S., & Ahmed, D. (2020). Home learning in times of covid: Experiences of parents. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 7(1), 9-26.
  5. Brannen, S., Ahmed, H., & Newton, H. (2020). Covid-19 Reshapes the Future. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25198
  6. Bubb, S., & Jones, M.-A. (2020). Learning from the COVID-19 home-schooling experience: Listening to pupils, parents/carers and teachers. Improving Schools, 23(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480220958797
  7. Burgess, S., & Sievertsen, H. (2020). Schools, skills, and learning: The impact of COVID-19 on education. Accessible at: https://voxeu.org/article/impact-covid-19-education
  8. Cabello-Hutt, T., Cabello, P., & Claro, M. (2018). Online opportunities and risks for children and adolescents: The role of digital skills, age, gender and parental mediation in Brazil. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2411–2431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724168
  9. Chang, G. C., & Yano, S. (2020). How are countries addressing the Covid-19 challenges in education? A snapshot of policy measures. Accessible at: https://gecv.ac.in/uploads/ssip/UNESCO%20snap%20shot%20for%20maintaining%20education.pdf
  10. Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323-343.
  11. Haller, T., & Novita, S. (2021). Parents’ Perceptions of School Support During COVID-19: What Satisfies Parents? Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.700441
  12. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
  13. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. The MIT Press.
  14. Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and information technologies, 21, 655-679.
  15. Lian, B., & Yoon, S.-Y. (2020). Burdens, Resilience, and Mutual Support: A Comparative Study of Families in China and South Korea Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 51(3/4), 337–346. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26976655
  16. Irhamni, M., & Sahadewo, G.A. (n.d.). Learning from home during the pandemic: The experiences of parents and teachers. The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL). Accessible at: https://www.povertyactionlab.org/project/learning-home-during-pandemic-experiences-parents-and-teachers
  17. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  18. Montessori, M. (2013). The Montessori Method. Transaction Publishers.
  19. Nathanson, A. (1998). The immediate and cumulative effects of television mediation on children’s aggression. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin–Madison.
  20. Petrie, C., Aladin, K., Ranjan, P., Javangwe, R., Gilliland, D., Tuominen, S., & Lasse, L. (2020). Quality education for all during Covid-19. Report from hundrED.org in partnership with the OECD. HundrED. Accessible at: https://hundred.org/en/reports/spotlight-on-quality-education-for-all-during-covid-19-crisis
  21. Saeed, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on education in Pakistan. accessible at: https://www.matrixmag.com/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education-in-pakistan/
  22. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
  23. Stringer, K. (2020). The pandemic changed our daily routines. Here is how that is impacting mental health, productivity and the environment. UW Graduate School. Accessible at: https://grad.uw.edu/student-alumni-profiles/the-pandemic-changed-our-daily-routines-heres-how-thats-impacting-mental-health-productivity-and-the-environment/
  24. Tran, T., Ho, M.-T., Pham, T.-H., Nguyen, M.-H., Nguyen, K.-L. P., Vuong, T.-T., Nguyen, T.-H. T., Nguyen, T.-D., Nguyen, T.-L., Khuc, Q., La, V.-P., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2020). How Digital Natives Learn and Thrive in the Digital Age: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Sustainability, 12(9), 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093819
  25. United Nations (2020). Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond, UN, Accessible at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf
  26. UNESCO. (2022). Education: From disruption to recovery - UNESCO. www.webarchive.unesco.org. Accessible at: https://webarchive.unesco.org/web/20220625033513/https:/en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
  27. Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: Instructive mediation, restrictive mediation, and social coviewing. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(1), 52–67.
  28. Whitaker, M. C. (2018). The hoover-dempsey and Sandler model of the parent involvement process. In: The Wiley Handbook of Family, School, and Community Relationships in Education, pp.419–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119083054.ch20
  29. Zainal, Z. (2017). Case Study As a Research Method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 5(1). Retrieved from https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/165