Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Generative AI and education

The effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Intelligent Tutoring Systems in higher education: A systematic review

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.33570bb1
Submitted
13 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

There is a lack of research regarding artificial intelligence (AI) applications in education settings, especially on whether generative AI can effectively advance intelligent tutoring and begin a new era of AI-powered effective tutors. The purpose of this systematic review was to thoroughly explore the evolution, potential applications, and challenges associated with AI-powered tutoring systems, formerly known as intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs), within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines in higher education. The research identified five prominent themes regarding the evolution of ITSs in the last five years: 1) integration of AI; 2) personalized and adaptive learning; 3) learning analytics; 4) inclusion and equity; and 5) STEM disciplines. In particular, it was found that ITSs are one of the key applications of AI technologies in education. The studies reviewed indicate that emerging technologies, including virtual reality, augmented reality, robots/avatars, and voice assistants, will likely play crucial roles in the next generation of these systems. Additionally, emphasis was placed on online and remote learning, gamification, inclusion, and equity.

In contrast, ethical issues are becoming a significant concern due to the enormous data usage of AI, specifically personal and other sensitive information. There is a general distrust toward AI technology, and ITSs are still new to many educators. Therefore, the systematic review evaluates how crucial it is to harness the potential of generative AI and ITSs responsibly. As we move forward, ensuring that ITSs complement, rather than replace, the essential role of human tutors is critical.

References

  1. Abbas, N., Ali, I., Manzoor, R., Hussain, T., & Hussain, M. H. A. i. (2023). Role of artificial intelligence tools in enhancing students’ educational performance at higher levels. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Neural Network, 3(5), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.55529/jaimlnn.35.36.49
  2. Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Educational technology: Exploring the convergence of technology and pedagogy through mobility, interactivity, AI, and learning tools. Cogent Engineering, 10(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2283282
  3. Alkhatlan, A., & Kalita, J. (2019). Intelligent tutoring systems: A comprehensive historical survey with recent developments. International Journal of Computer Applications, 181(43), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019918451
  4. Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), 12983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983
  5. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education: Contributors, collaborations, research topics, challenges, and future directions. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202201_25(1).0003
  6. Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-H., Tu, Y.-F., & Yang, K.-H. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7526
  7. Collins, K., & Lanxon, A. (2024, January 10). Biggest Trends of CES 2024: AI, Transparent Screens and Off-Grid Tech to Power Your Home. CNET. Accessible at: https://www.cnet.com/tech/biggest-trends-of-ces-2024-ai-transparent-screens-and-off-grid-tech-to-power-your-home/
  8. Correia, A.-P. (2023, March 15). Is ChatGPT the new buzz in Higher Education? Accessible at: https://www.ana-paulacorreia.com/anapaula-correias-blog/2023/3/15/is-chatgpt-the-new-buzz-in-higher-education
  9. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
  10. du Boulay, B. (2019). Escape from the Skinner Box: The case for contemporary intelligent learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2902–2919. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12860
  11. García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & León, S. P. (2023). Analysing the impact of artificial intelligence and computational sciences on student performance: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240
  12. Goldman Sachs (2023, August 1). AI investment forecast to approach $200 billion globally by 2025. Goldman Sachs. Accessible at: https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/pages/ai-investment-forecast-to-approach-200-billion-globally-by-2025.html
  13. Google. (2018). Get unstuck. Learn better. Google Socratic. https://socratic.org
  14. Government Technology. (2023, May 25). Is ChatGPT Better Than a Human Tutor? Survey Says ... Yes. GovTech. Accessible at: https://www.govtech.com/education/k-12/is-chatgpt-better-than-a-human-tutor-survey-says-yes
  15. Grossman, N. (2023, May 18). AI won’t replace teachers, but it can make them more effective. The Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Accessible at: https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/commentary/ai-wont-replace-teachers-it-can-make-them-more-effective
  16. Guo, L., Wang, D., Gu, F., Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhou, R. (2021). Evolution and trends in intelligent tutoring systems research: A multidisciplinary and scientometric view. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09697-7
  17. Gupta, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Supporting inclusive learning using chatbots? A chatbot-led interview study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 33(1), 98–108. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol33/iss1/11/
  18. Ipek, Z. H., Gözüm, A. I. C., Papadakis, S., & Kallogiannakis, M. (2023). Educational applications of the ChatGPT AI system: A systematic review research. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(3), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.123.2
  19. Jing, Y., Zhao, L., Zhu, K., Wang, H., Wang, C., & Xia, Q. (2023). Research landscape of adaptive learning in education: A bibliometric study on research publications from 2000 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(4), 3115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043115
  20. Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 12451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451
  21. Khan Academy. (2023). Meet Khanmigo, Khan Academy’s AI-powered teaching assistant & tutor. Accessible at: https://khanmigo.ai/
  22. Kumar, D., Haque, A., Mishra, K., Islam, F., Mishra, B. K., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Exploring the transformative role of artificial intelligence and metaverse in education: A comprehensive review. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, 2, 55. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202355
  23. Lv, Z. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence in the metaverse era. Cognitive Robotics, 3, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2023.06.001
  24. Manaware, D. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A New Way to Improve Indian Agriculture. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(3), 1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.903.128
  25. Microsoft. (2020). New IDC report shows big opportunities to transform higher education through AI. Microsoft Education Blog. Accessible at: https://educationblog.microsoft.com/en-us/2020/03/new-idc-report-shows-big-opportunities-to-transform-higher-education-through-ai
  26. Nagaraj, B. K., Kalaivani, A., Suraj Begum, R., Akila, S., Sachdev, H. K., & Senthil Kumar, N. (2023). The emerging role of artificial intelligence in STEM higher education: A critical review. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation, 5(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.54392/irjmt2351
  27. Niño-Rojas, F., Lancheros-Cuesta, D., Jiménez-Valderrama, M. T. P., Mestre, G., & Gómez, S. (2024). Systematic Review: Trends in Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Mathematics Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3189
  28. OpenAI. (2018). Improving language understanding with unsupervised learning. OpenAI. Accessible at: https://openai.com/research/language-unsupervised
  29. Psotka, J., Massey, L. D., & Mutter, S. A. (1988). Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lessons Learned. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-97858-000
  30. Qian Cao, Ye Huang, Tingting Luo, & Lei Liu. (2022). Effect of virtual simulation teaching system on learning of students majoring in engineering technology. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Review, 15(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.153.25
  31. Renz, A., & Vladova, G. (2021). Reinvigorating the discourse on human-centered artificial intelligence in educational technologies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(5), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1438
  32. Rosé, C. P., McLaughlin, E. A., Liu, R., & Koedinger, K. R. (2019). Explanatory learner models: Why machine learning (alone) is not the answer. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2943–2958. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12858
  33. Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Oshima, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence and new technologies in inclusive education for minority students: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(20), 13572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013572
  34. Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. Bloomsbury. https://books.google.com/books?id=csZKEAAAQBAJ
  35. Shi, D., Zhou, J., Wang, D., & Wu, X. (2022). Research status, hotspots, and evolutionary trends of intelligent education from the perspective of knowledge graph. Sustainability (2071-1050), 14(17), 10934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710934
  36. Smolansky, A., Cram, A., Raduescu, C., Zeivots, S., Huber, E., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). Educator and Student Perspectives on the Impact of Generative AI on Assessments in Higher Education. Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, (pp. 378–382). https://doi.org/10.1145/3573051.3596191
  37. Triplett, W. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in STEM education. Cybersecurity and Innovative Technology Journal, 1(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.53889/citj.v1i1.296
  38. Wadhwani, P. (2023). AI in education market statistics, trends & growth opportunity 2032. Global Market Insights. Accessible at: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-in-education-market
  39. Wang, S., Yu, H., Hu, X., & Li, J. (2020). Participant or spectator? Comprehending the willingness of faculty to use intelligent tutoring systems in the artificial intelligence era. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1657–1673. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12998
  40. Weitekamp, D., Harpstead, E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). An Interaction Design for Machine Teaching to Develop AI Tutors. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376226
  41. World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023. World Economic Forum. Accessible at: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/digest/
  42. Xie, H., Hwang, G.-J., & Wong, T.-L. (2021). Editorial Note: From Conventional AI to Modern AI in Education: Re-examining AI and Analytic Techniques for Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 85–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032857
  43. Xu, W., & Fan, O. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: A systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(59), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5
  44. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0