logo

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Generative AI and education

How disruptive is AI in students’ academic writing in higher education?

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.b1d05ed3
Submitted
13 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of artificial Intelligence (AI) tools on academic writing (AW) in higher education (HE) and focuses on their dual role as enablers and disruptors. Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework, the research combines a review of recent literature with a case study of six Masters’ students at a University in the Midlands in the United Kingdom (UK). The study examines specific areas in AW where AI tools such as Grammarly, Google Scholar, and ChatGPT are used, particularly to improve lower-order skills like grammar and fluency, and the challenges in supporting higher-order skills like critical thinking and originality. Semi-structured interviews provided qualitative insights into students’ perceptions, usage patterns and barriers, which were analysed thematically and linked to the UTAUT framework. Key findings show that while AI tools improve efficiency and support non-native speakers, students have concerns about ethical issues (e.g., plagiarism, authorship), limited trust in AI-generated content, and barriers like digital literacy gaps. The study calls for institutions to address these challenges by integrating AI tools carefully, offering targeted training, and creating clear policies on AI use. Despite the small sample size, the findings provide valuable insights into AI’s roles in AW and its implications for improving the use of AI in HE.

References

  1. Adams, D., & Chuah, K.-M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Research Writing: Current Trends and Future Potentials. In: Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. CRC Press. 10.1201/9781003184157-9
  2. Akinwalere, S., & Ivanov, V. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Border Crossing, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v12i1.2015
  3. Baker, T., Smith, L., & Anissa, N. (2019). Educ-AI-tion Rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. NESTA. Retrieved from: https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/education-rebooted/
  4. Basic, Z., et al. (2023). Better by you, better than me, ChatGPT3 as writing assistance in students' essays. arXiv. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.04536
  5. Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(42). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x
  6. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/2/
  7. Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
  8. Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-H., Tu, Y.-F., & Russell, K.-H. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7526
  9. Dhawan, S., & Batra G. (2020). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Promises, perils, and perspective. OJAS - Expanding Knowledge Horizon, 9(2), 11-22.
  10. Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622. 10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
  11. European Union. (2021). Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206
  12. Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069
  13. Golan, R., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: A paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nature Reviews Urology, 20(6), 327-328. 10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x
  14. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chambers, A. B. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction. In: C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.). Handbook of Writing Research (2nd ed., pp. 211-226).
  15. Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. Continuum.
  16. Kennedy, M. L., & Kennedy, W. J. (2012). Writing in the disciplines: A reader and rhetoric for academic writers. Pearson.
  17. Khabib, S. (2022). Introducing artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital writing assistants for teachers in writing scientific articles. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 1(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v1i2.249
  18. Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., Ryan, P., Sándor, Á., & Wang, X. (2018). Designing academic writing analytics for civil law student self-assessment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28, 1-28. http://hdl.handle.net/10453/54728
  19. Kumar, A. H. (2023). Analysis of ChatGPT tool to assess the potential of its utility for academic writing in biomedical domain. Biology Engineering Medicine and Science Reports, 9(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.5530/bems.9.1.5
  20. Lo, C. K. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
  21. Mahler, T. (2022). Regulating artificial general intelligence (AGI). In: Law and Artificial Intelligence: Regulating AI and Applying AI in Legal Practice (pp. 521-540). TMC Asser Press.
  22. Maphoto, K. (2022). First-year students at an open distance and e-learning institution: Perceptions, expectations, and challenges associated with academic writing feedback. Journal for Language Teaching, 56(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.56285/jltVol56iss1a5413
  23. Mena-Guacas, A. F., Rodríguez, J. A. U., Trujillo, D. M. S., Gómez-Galán J., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Collaborative learning and skill development for educational growth of artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep428. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13123
  24. Merisi, P. O., & Mtanha-Matariro, M. (2024). The role of faculty intervention in enhancing academic writing skills through AI tools in higher education. In: ICERI2024 Proceedings, pp. 9539-9544. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2024.2409
  25. Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7, e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
  26. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
  27. Ocaña-Fernández, Y., Valenzuela-Fernández, L. A., & Garro-Aburto, L. L. (2019). Inteligencia artificial y sus implicaciones en la educación superior. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(2), 536-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n2.274
  28. Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2024). Beyond the hype: exploring faculty perceptions and acceptability of AI in teaching practices. Discover Education, 3(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00128-4
  29. Passey, D. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning: Rethinking the term, the concept, and its theoretical background. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 972-986. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12783
  30. Pividori, M. & Greene, C. (2023). A publishing infrastructure for AI-assisted academic authoring [Preprint]. National Library of Medicine. 10.1101/2023.01.21.525030
  31. Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR and TPCK: A hands-on approach to classroom practice. Hipassus.
  32. Rapp, C., & Kauf, P. (2018). Scaling academic writing instruction: Evaluation of a scaffolding tool (Thesis Writer). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(4), 590–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0162-z
  33. Rozencwajg, S. & Kantor, E. (2023). Elevating scientific writing with ChatGPT: A guide for reviewers, editors… and authors. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101209
  34. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Hoboken.
  35. Schmohl, T., Watanabe, A., Fröhlich, N., & Herzberg, D. (2020). How can Artificial Intelligence improve the Academic Writing of Students? In: Conference Proceedings. The Future of Education 2020. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:27913
  36. Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & education, 131, 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005
  37. Sullivan M., Kelly A., & McLaughlan P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17
  38. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
  39. Turnitin. (2023). Turnitin announces AI writing detector and AI writing resource center for educators. https://www.turnitin.com/press/turnitin-announces-ai-writing-detector-and-ai-writing-resource-center-for-educators
  40. UNESCO. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994
  41. University of San Diego. (2023). 39 Examples of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Retrieved from: https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/artificial-intelligence-education/
  42. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  43. Vincent-Lancrin, S. & van der Vlies, R. (2020). Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Promises and challenges. OECD Education Working Papers. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/trustworthy-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-education_a6c90fa9-en.html
  44. Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
  45. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.