logo

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): TEL in English language teaching, learning and assessment

Borderless technology enhanced learning: The affordances of COIL in ELT educator preparation programs

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.2792a1cc
Submitted
13 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

The implementation of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) and Virtual Exchange (VE) projects is crucial for advancing Internationalization at Home (IaH) in higher education, especially within Educator Preparation Programs (EPPs). These cross-border collaborations democratize access to global interactions and are expanding in scope and quality. This research examines how undergraduate pre-service teachers engaged in Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) during a COIL project, contributing to their global competencies as future educators.

This single case study provides a descriptive understanding of online cross-cultural collaborative interactions in teacher education. Two teacher educators from Brazil and the United States co-designed activities using online platforms, interactive tools, and social media to support innovative pedagogical approaches and enhance students’ cultural awareness. Through cross-cultural dialogue and knowledge co-creation, students engaged in reflective discourse on diversity, acceptance, language, and power dynamics.

The analysis of structured activities and discussions offers practical insights and recommendations for teacher educators integrating similar approaches to promote global citizenship. The findings highlight how technology enhances learning and cross-cultural engagement, equipping educators with tools to facilitate intercultural dialogue, improve language proficiency, and cultivate global competencies like cultural awareness and communication skills. This study illustrates how TEL supports the development of language proficiency and intercultural understanding, enriching EPPs and preparing educators for a globalized classroom.

References

  1. Anzai, Y., & Shimizu, H. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of COIL for foreign language education. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 16(2), 46–54.
  2. Atkinson, W. (2025). Field theory, role theory, and role conflict: Reappropriating insights from the past. Journal of Classical Sociology, 25(1): 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X2312084
  3. Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015). Redefining internationalization at home. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 59-72). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_5
  4. Boix Mansilla, V. (2016). How to be a global thinker. Educational Leadership, 74(4), 10-16.
  5. Calvo, L. C. S. Hartle, L. C. (2024). Virtual exchange in teacher education programs from Brazil and USA: outcomes and challenges. Texto Livre, 17(e47921). https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2024.47921
  6. Choo, S. S. (2021). Teaching ethics through literature: The significance of Ethical Criticism in a global age. Routledge.
  7. Cookies, B. (2022, November 13). To the girl in English class by Hafsat Abdullahi. [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0dwqlnzOdY
  8. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
  10. Davies-Vollum, K. S., Ribchester, C., Danso-Wiredu, E. Y., & Raha, D. (2023). Virtual mobility to enhance intercultural competences for a more sustainable future. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(5), 833-847. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2224770
  11. Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of studies in international education, 10(3), 241-266.
  12. Flores, N. & García, E. S. (2020). Power, language, and bilingual learners. In N.S. Nasir, C.D. Lee, R. Pea, and M.M. de Royston (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning. (pp. 178-191).
  13. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  14. Gokcora, D. (2021). Benefits of collaborative online international learning projects. Academia Letters, Article 202. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL202.
  15. Guimarães, F. F., Mendes, A. R. M., Rodrigues, L. M. Paiva, R. S. dos S. & Finardi, K. R. (2019). Internationalization at home, COIL and intercomprehension: For more inclusive activities in the global south. Simon Fraser University Educational Review Journal, 2(3). 89-103 https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/sfuer/issue/view/64/41
  16. Hackett, S., Dawson, M., Janssen, J., & Tartwijk, J. (2024). Defining collaborative online international learning (COIL) and distinguishing it from virtual exchange. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01000-w
  17. Hackett, S., Janssen, J., Beach, P., Perreault, M., Beelen, J., & van Tarwijk, J. (2023). The effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) on intercultural competence development in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00373-3
  18. Hauerwas, L.B, Kerkhoff, S.N. & Schneider, S. B. (2021) Glocality, reflexivity, interculturality, and worldmaking: A Framework for critical global teaching. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 35(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2021.1900714
  19. Holliday, A. (2017). Recognising what English language students bring to the classroom: Autonomy, authenticity and Web 2.0. Canterbury: Christ Church University. https://adrianholliday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/web2.17.pdf
  20. Hossain, K. I. (2023). Reviewing the role of culture in English language learning: Challenges and opportunities for educators. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100781
  21. Hudzik, J. K. (2011). Comprehensive Internationalization: From concept to action. Washington D.C.: NAFSA: Association of International Educators.
  22. Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J. (2024). Collaborative international online learning for the development of intercultural awareness: An experience with pre-service language teachers. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(1/2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-09-2023-0093
  23. Hülmbauer, C., Böhringer, H., & Seidlhofer, B. (2008). Introducing English as a lingua franca (ELF): Precursor and partner in intercultural communication. Synergies Europe, 3, 25-36. https://gerflint.fr/Base/Europe3/hulmbauer.pdf
  24. Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. L. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 303-342). Sage.
  25. Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2006). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues. Routledge.
  26. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.
  27. Moran, J. (2018) Metodologias ativas para uma aprendizagem mais profunda. In Moran, J., & Bacich, L. (Orgs.). Metodologias ativas para uma educação inovadora: Uma abordagem teórico-prática. (Vol.1), 35-38.
  28. OECD/Asia Society. (2018). Teaching for Global Competence in a Rapidly Changing World.
  29. OECD Publishing, Paris/Asia Society, New York. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264289024-en
  30. Parmigiani, D,. Jones, S.L., Kunnari, I. Nicchia, E. (2022). Global competence and teacher education programmes. A European perspective, Cogent Education, 9:1, 2022996, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2022996
  31. Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Rubin, J. (2017) Embedding Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) at Higher Education Institutions. Internationalisation of Higher Education (Vol. 2), 27-44.
  33. Rubin, J. (2022). Preface to an evolving International Education Landscape. In Rubin, J., & Guth, S. P. (Eds.). The Guide to COIL virtual exchange: Implementing, growing and sustaining collaborative online international learning. Routledge.
  34. Selvi, A. F., Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2024). Teaching English as an International Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Tierney, W.G., & Rhoads, R.A. (2004). Postmodernism and critical theory in higher education: Implications for research and practice. In. J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook for theory and research (Vol. 9). Agathon Press.
  36. Vázquez-Villegas, P., Gómez-Guerrero, D., Mejía-Manzano, L.A., Gisselle Morales-Veloquio, G., Montaño-Salinas, L.P. & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024). Evaluation of good practices and opportunity areas of a Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) program: Global shared learning classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22247–22286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12739-3
  37. Wexler, L. J., & Hinojosa, D. M. (2017). Beliefs and perceptions about their preparation to teach English language learners: Voices of mainstream pre-service teachers. International Journal of TESOL and Learning, 6(3 and 4), 41–61.
  38. Wimpenny, K., Finardi, K. R., Orsini-Jones, M., & Jacobs, L. (2022). Knowing, being, relating and expressing through third space Global South-North COIL: Digital inclusion and equity in international higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(2), 279–296. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360741349_Knowing_Being_Relating_and_Expressing_Through_Third_Space_Global_SouthNorth_COIL_Digital_Inclusion_and_Equity_in_International_Higher_Education
  39. Zeng J, Ponce, A.R. & Li, Y. (2023) English linguistic neo-imperialism in the era of globalization: A conceptual viewpoint. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1149471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149471