Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Activity theory in technology enhanced learning research (part 2)

Navigating digital skills contradictions with boys’ secondary school students: The teachers’ perspective

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.33d36680
Submitted
14 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

Students’ digital skills development seems to be a pertinent issue as we progress into the fourth industrial revolution (4IR) and involves student readiness for Education 4.0. However, literature pertaining to digital skills development is often positioned in Higher Education (HE) and often reports on the lack of students' digital skills. Factors such as poor infrastructure and insufficient teachers’ continuous professional development (CPD) have been reported as reasons for this underdevelopment. However, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), government schools are well-resourced and serviced by digitally skilled practitioners who are regularly offered CPD, yet students’ digital skills still seem underdeveloped. As such, this paper aims to add to the discussion in the literature by focusing on secondary school teachers’ perspectives on the challenges they face when developing students’ digital skills. Underpinned by Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), the study employed a case study methodology using semi-structured group interviews with four teachers from Creative Computer Design and Innovation (CCDI), English, Math and Science. Themes relating to the lack of students’ digital and basic literacy skills, students’ attitudes and behaviours, and organisational policy emerged as challenges teachers experience whilst trying to develop students' digital skills. Consequently, the paper recommends addressing these challenges through policies that work in tandem with each other to improve digital skills within this and wider contexts.

References

  1. Al-Ali, S. (2020). Activity systems analysis: A Maze Worth Exploring. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.39ed7528
  2. Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., & Fors, U. (2020). Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 957-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09998-w
  3. Bhandari, B., Jain, C., & Sahu, A. K. (2021). Are Secondary Schools Imparting Digital Skills? An Empirical Assessment. Margin The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 15(1), 73-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801020976607
  4. Bihal, R. (2023). Teachers Identity Impact on Technology Use and Creation of Community of Inquiry in Face-To-Face Environments: A Case Study in a UAE Government Secondary Boys School. Lancaster: Unpublished Manuscript, Lancaster University.
  5. Bikowski, D., & Casal, J. E. (2018). Interactive digital textbooks and engagement: a learning strategies. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 119-136. https://doi.org/10125/44584
  6. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2015). The Change Laboratory in Higher Education: Research-Intervention using Activity Theory. In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (pp. 148-168). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220150000001007
  7. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity Theory in Empirical Higher Education Research: Choices, Uses and Values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
  8. Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50, 475-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017
  9. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education (5th ed.). Oxon: Routledge Falmer.
  11. Cong-Lem, N. (2022). Unravelling Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT): Leontiev's and Engestrom's Approaches to Activity Theory. Knowledge Cultures, 10(1), 84-103. https://doi.org/10.22381/kc10120225
  12. Egbert, J., & Sherry, S. (2020). Foundations of Education Research Understanding Theoretical Components (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
  13. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  14. Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by Expanding: an Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Erdogdu, F., & Erdogdu, E. (2023). Understanding students’ attitudes towards ICT. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7467-7485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2073455
  16. Gedera, D. S., & Williams, P. J. (2016). Activity Theory in Education: Research and Practice. Springer.
  17. Gómez-Poyato, M. J., Eito-Mateo, A., Mira-Tamayo, D. C., & Matías-Solanilla, A. (2022). Digital Skills, ICTs and Students’ Needs: A Case Study in Social Work Degree, University of Zaragoza (Aragón-Spain). Education Sciences, 12(17), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070443
  18. Grimalt-Alvaro, P. C., & Jaume, P. A. (2021). A Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Approach for the Design of a Qualitative Methodology in Science Educational Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211060664
  19. Joo, K. P. (2014). A Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Investigation of Contradictions in Open and Distance Higher Education among Alienated Adult Learners in Korea National Open University. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1605
  20. Karunanayaka, S. P., Weerakoon, W. M.S., Wijesekera, H.D., Nawarathna, N. M. R. K., Ramathass. P., & Weerasinghe, M. D. B. P. (2021). Towards Digital Thinking and Practices: Experiences of Sri Lankan Teachers and Students. Open Praxis, 13(4), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.51944/openpraxis.13.4.262
  21. Khoza, S. B. (2023). Can Teachers’ Identities Come to the Rescue in the Fourth Industrial Revolution? Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(1), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09560-z
  22. Kuhl, P. K., Lim, S.-S., Guerriero , S., & van Damme, D. (2019). Developing Minds in the Digital Age: Towards a Science of Learning for 21st Century Education. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/562a8659-en
  23. Miles, R., Al-Ali, S., Charles, T., Hill, C., & Bligh, B. (2021). Technology enhanced learning in the MENA region: Introduction to the Special Issue. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 293-300. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.df527b9d
  24. Murphy, E., & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2013). An Overview of Activity Theory in Technology-Mediated Higher Education. In Activity Theory Perspectives on Technology in Higher Education (pp. 20-53). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4590-5.ch002
  25. Mwanza-Simwami, D. (2011). AODM as a framework and model for characterising learner experiences with technology. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 7(3), 75-85.
  26. Nalaila, S., Wawire, V., & Gathara, P. M. (2022). Classroom Support for Students’ Digital Literacy Skills for Learning in Tanzania’s Public Universities. Development in Practice, 32(7), 867-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2022.2104219
  27. Ridge, N. (2014). The Reverse Gender Divide (1st ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
  28. UNESCO. (2017). Working Group on Education: Digital skills for life and work. Retrieved March 1, 2024, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259013/PDF/259013eng.pdf.multi
  29. United Arab Emirates Ministry of Education. (2023). Digital Transformation journey in Education. Retrieved May 25, 2024, from https://www.moe.gov.ae/En/ImportantLinks/Pages/DigitalTransformation.aspx
  30. Weninger, C. (2022). Skill versus Social Practice? Some Challenges in Teaching Digital Literacy in the University Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 1016-1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3134
  31. Wild, S., & Heuling, L. S. (2020). How do the digital competences of students in vocational schools differ from those of students in cooperative higher education institutions in Germany? Empirical Research in Vocational Educational Training, 15(5), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-020-00091-y
  32. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods (6 ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
  33. Youssef, A. B., Dahmani, M., & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide. Information, 13(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129