logo

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): TEL in English language teaching, learning and assessment

Evaluating “Reading Bear”: An analysis of a multimedia phonics programme using Mayer’s principles of multimedia learning

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.f4a4ff76
Submitted
13 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

This study evaluates Reading Bear (RB), a multimedia phonics programme, using Mayer’s 12 principles of multimedia learning to assess its design for phonics instruction. The results suggest that RB aligns well with key principles such as spatial contiguity, segmenting, and multimedia integration, effectively supporting phonics learning by combining visuals and audio in a structured format. However, partial adherence to the redundancy, personalisation, and modality principles suggests areas for improvement, such as reducing redundant text, adopting a conversational tone, and adjusting audio pacing. These refinements could enhance the pedagogical impact of RB, making it a more adaptable tool for young learners. This analysis provides useful insights for schools, educational administrators, teachers, and policymakers considering the implementation of phonics programmes in different learning contexts. Future research could further explore the usability of RB through quantitative analysis, large-scale research and comparative studies.

References

  1. Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2014). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 206-226). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.011
  2. Børte, K., & Lillejord, S. (2024). Learning to teach: Aligning pedagogy and technology in a learning design tool. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, 104693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104693
  3. Butcher, K. R. (2014). The multimedia principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 174-205). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.010
  4. Chen, I. C. (2018). The application of augmented reality in English phonics learning performance of ESL uoung learners 2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2018.000-7
  5. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Open coding. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, 2(1990), 101.
  6. de Graaff, S., Bosman, A. M. T., Hasselman, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(4), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430903001308
  7. Ehri, L. C. (2020). The science of learning to read words: A case for systematic phonics instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.334
  8. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  9. Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2014). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 247-262). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.013
  10. Lan, Y.-J. (2021). Language learning in virtual reality: Theoretical foundations and empIrical practices. In Y.-J. Lan & S. Grant (Eds.), Contextual Language Learning: Real Language Learning on the Continuum from Virtuality to Reality (pp. 1-21). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3416-1_1
  11. Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2014). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 227-246). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.012
  12. Mahayuddin, Z. R., & Mamat, N. (2019). Implementing augmented reality (AR) on phonics-based literacy among children with autism. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(6), 2176-2181. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.6.6833
  13. Mayer, R. E. (2014a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 43-71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
  14. Mayer, R. E. (2014b). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 1-24). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.002
  15. Mayer, R. E. (2014c). Principles based on social cues in multimedia learning: Personalization, voice, image, and embodiment principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 345-368). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.017
  16. Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 279-315). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.015
  17. Mayer, R. E., & Pilegard, C. (2014). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pre-training, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 316-344). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.016
  18. O’Brien, B. A., Seward, R., & Zhang, D. (2022). Multisensory interactive digital rext for English phonics instruction with bilingual beginning readers. Education Sciences, 12(11), 750. Retrieved 2022/10/26, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110750
  19. Reading Bear. (n.d.). About Reading Bear. Reading Bear. Retrieved 7/5/2023 from https://www.readingbear.org/About.aspx
  20. Shanahan, T., & Lonigan, C. J. (2010). The national early literacy panel: A summary of the process and the report. Educational Researcher, 39(4), 279-285. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10369172
  21. van Gog, T. (2014). The signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2 ed., pp. 263-278). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.014
  22. Wyse, D., & Goswami, U. (2008). Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 691-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802268912