logo

Articles

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Activity theory in technology enhanced learning research (part 2)

Adopting principles of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory to conceptualise digital pedagogy practices in the post-16 education sector and their implications on teaching and learning

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.00565a5c
Submitted
14 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conceptualise how teachers in the post-16 education sector in the U.K. use digital technologies in their pedagogy practice. The motivation for this study originated from prior literature review research on the level of digital technology capabilities of post-16 teachers individually and their adoption of technology innovation in the classroom. This paper contributes to the literature as it takes a broader view that looks at an institution's practices and considers departmental variables. Moreover, the use of activity system as the unit of analysis guided by Cultural-Historical Activity Theory framework enabled consideration of sociocultural aspects by focusing not only on the practitioner but also how digital pedagogy is embedded within the practice environment. The analysis focusses on identifying: (RQ1) what motivates teachers in the post-16 sector to integrate ICT into their pedagogical practices; (RQ2) how digital pedagogy practices are being implemented in post-16 teaching and learning; and (RQ3) what contradictions are experienced in these digital pedagogy activities. The research findings contribute to the literature by establishing how the limited digital pedagogy practice in the setting arises from teachers’ inter-institutional struggles, due to their professional commitment and the lack of adequate support for continual development in place. However, further research on how teachers can access a wider repertoire of mediational means to support and overcome contradictions in their digital pedagogy practices is needed.

References

  1. Attwell, G., & Gerrard, A. (2019). The Training and Professional Development of Teachers in Use of Digital Technologies in Vocational education and Training. Trends in vocational education and training research (pp. 38-44). VETNET European research Network Vocational Education and Training. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3371247
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
  3. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2020). An Introduction to Rethinking Pedagogy. Oxon: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  4. BERA. (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th. London: British Educational Research Association. Retrieved 02 2023
  5. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2015). The Change Laboratory in Higher Education: research-intervention using activity theory. In J. Huisman, & M. Tight, Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (Vol. 1, pp. 141-168). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
  6. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity theory in empirical higher education research: choices, uses and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(2), 125-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
  7. Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn't technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50, 475-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017
  8. Bower, M., Highfield, K., Furney, P., & Mowbray, L. (2013). Supporting pre-service teachers' technology-enabled leaning design thinking through whole of programme transformation. Educational Media International, 50(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2013.777183
  9. Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of Adoption of Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 399-426. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148690
  10. Brun, M., & Hinostroza, E. (2014). Learning to become a teacher in the 21st century: ICT integration in initial teacher education in Chile. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 222-238. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.3.222
  11. Camilleri, R.-a. (2022). Investigating the impact of digital resources on pedagogy in a Maltese kindergarten classroom through an activity theory approach. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.51c509cc
  12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education. (7th, Ed.) London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  13. Cong-Lem, N. (2022). Unravelling Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT): Leontiev's and Engeström's Approaches to Activity Theory. Knowledge Cultures, 10(1), 84-103. https://doi.org/10.22381/kc10120225
  14. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
  15. Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity Theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Economics, 43(7), 960-974.
  16. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamaki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774
  17. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sedurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59, 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  18. Gierhart , A. R., & Seglem, R. (2024). Narrativising digital pedagogy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.2003888
  19. Havnes, A. (2004). Examination and learning: an activity-theoretical analysis of the relationship between assessment and educational practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000188456
  20. Henn, M., Weinstein, M., & Foard, N. (2009). A Critical Introduction to Social Research (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  21. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  22. Higgins, S. (2003). Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools? A professional user review of the UK research undertaken for the British Educational Research Association. British Educational Research Association.
  23. Ilaltdinova, E., Belyaeva, T., & Lebedeva, I. (2019). Digital pedagogy: features of the term evolution in the framework of categories and concepts of pedagogy. Perspectives of Science & Education, 4, 40.
  24. Istrate, O. (2022). Digital Pedagogy. Definition and Conceptual Area. Journal of Digital Pedagogy, 1(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.61071/JDP.0313
  25. Jisc. (2020). Elevating the UK further education and skills sector: Strategy review 2020-2030. Jisc.
  26. Jisc. (2020/2021). Digital Pedagogy Toolkit. Helping academics to make informed choices when embedding digital into the curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/exploring-the-digital-pedagogy-toolkit
  27. Kaptelinin , V., & Nardi, B. (2012). Activity Theory in HCI Fundamentals and Reflections. Penn State: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
  28. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with Technology. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  29. Karel, K., Acker, F. V., Vermeulen, M., & Buuren, H. V. (2013). What stimulates teachers to integrate ICT into their pedagogical practices? The use of digital learning materials in education. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29, 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.008
  30. Kim, M. K., Xie, K., & Cheng, S.-L. (2017). Building teacher competency for digital content evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.006
  31. Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014
  32. Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in the Norwegian teacher education schools. Högre Utbildning, 1(1), 39-51. Retrieved from http://hogreutbildning.se/page/om-tidskriften
  33. Lewin, C., Cranmer, S., & McNicol, S. (2018). Developing digital pedagogy through learning design: An activity theory perspective. British Journal of Education Technology, 49(6), 1131-1144. https://doi.org/10.111/bjet.12705
  34. Littlejohn, D. (2007). Pedagogical Practice: Applying Post-positivism and Activity Theory in Today's Technologically Mediated Design Education. Analytic Essay. DDN 702, Perver Baran: ResearchGate.
  35. Mykhailenko, O., Blayone, T., Zogla, I., & Lubkina, V. (2019). Using Activity Theory for Modelling Transformative Digital Learning. Environment. Technology. Resources. Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Practical Conference, pp. 222-227. Rezekne: Rezekne Academy of Technologies.
  36. Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the Dialectic. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  37. Oxford University Press. (n.d.). What is a digital pedagogy and why do we need one? Retrieved from Oxford University Press: https://www.oup.com.au/media/documents/higher-education/he-samples-pages/he-teacher-ed-landing-page-sample-chapters/HOWELL_9780195578430_SC.pdf
  38. Rawat, S., Tiwari, S., Sharma, M., & Chatterjee, N. (2022). Development and Validation of a Brief Digital Pedagogy Competency Scale (DiPeCoS). International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
  39. Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (2001). Effects of teacher efficacy on computer skills and computer cognition in Canadian students in Grades K-3. Elementary School Journal, 102, 141-156.
  40. Russell , D. L., & Schneiderheinze, A. (2005). Understanding Innovation in Education Using Activity Theory. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 38-53.
  41. Russell, D. L. (2005). Understanding Innovation in Education Using Activity Theory. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 38-53.
  42. Rust, J. (2017). Pedagogy meets digital mediation: A triangle of teachers, strategies, and tactics. Contemporary issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 17(2), 168-193.
  43. Sannino , A., & Engeström, Y. (2018). Cultural-historical activity theory: founding insights and new challenges. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 14(3), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2018140304
  44. Sannino, A. (2011). Activity Theory as an activist and interventionist theory. Theory and Psychology, 21(5), 571-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311417485
  45. Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutierrez, K. D. (2009). Activity Theory Between Historical Engagement and Future-Making Practice. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutierrez, Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory (pp. 1-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutierrez, K. D. (2009). Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  48. Spinuzzi, C. (2020). "Trying to predict the future": third-generation activity theory's codesign orientation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 27(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1660790
  49. Tokarova, V. I. (2018). Adaptive system of the mathematical training of students: structural and content component. Innovative Projects and Programs in Education, 4, 78-83.
  50. Toktarova, V. I., & Semenova, D. A. (2020). Digital pedagogy: analysis, requirements and experience of implementation. 1691, p. 16. Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-65596/1691/1/012112
  51. UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2022). Digital skills development in TVET teacher training. Trends mapping study. Bonn: UNESCO.
  52. Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers' internalization of external barriers and externalisation of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers & Education, 118, 78-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009
  53. Watulak , L., & Kinzer, K. C. (2013). Beyond Technology Skills: Toward a framework for critical digital literacies in pre-service technology education. In J. Avila, & Z. J. Pandya, Critical digital literacies as social praxis: intersections and challenges (pp. 127-153). Peter Lang Publishing .
  54. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
  55. Wohlfart, O., & Wagner, I. (2023). Teacher's role in digitalizing education: an umbrella review. Education Tech research Dev (71), 339-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10166-0
  56. Wood, E., Muller, J., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., & Deyoung, T. (2007). Teachers' Perceptions: barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. Education, Communication & Innovation, 5(2), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310500186214
  57. Yang, C., Guo, R., & Cui, Y. (2023). What Affects Vocational Teachers' Acceptance and Use of ICT in Teaching? A Large-Scale Survey of Higher Vocational College Teachers in China. Behavioural Sciences, 13(77). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010077
  58. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study research. Design and Methods (Vol. 5). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  59. Zhang, Y., & Shuiyun, L. (2021). Re-professionalisation or de-professionalisation: How do Chinese high school teachers respond to the new professionalism? Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1959382