Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Power and Theories of Social Practice: Bringing Capacity into Question with a Focus on Plastic Packaging Recycling

A selection of multicoloured plastic buckets stacked up.

Abstract

In this essay, we conceptualise ‘capacity’ as a means of attending to power and addressing corollary issues of disparity and social change in a manner commensurate with the ontological commitments of second-wave theories of practice. While second-wave theories of practice justifiably see power as immanent to the enactment and ordering of practices, the challenge remains to develop convincing analytical tools capable of empirically parsing the relations that give rise to social disparities. Our conceptualisation of capacity, which comprises three interwoven dimensions (potential, limit, and position), responds to this challenge and, in doing so, illuminates how practices are imbued with and produce social disparities in capacities to act. To illustrate the novel empirical tractability that our conceptualisation of capacity contributes to the debate on power and second-wave theories of practice, we focus on and critique the assumed ‘power’ of packaging design practitioners to tackle waste by enhancing the recyclability of plastic packaging. As this case demonstrates, the conceptualisation of capacity articulated in this paper contributes a powerful means for practice-theoretical research to unpick and address the details and dynamics of disparities in capacities to act, sharpening insight into the constraints and possibilities for social change.

Keywords

capacity , plastic recycling, power, social change, sustainability

PDF HTML

References

  1. Barnes, B. (1995) The Elements of Social Theory. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315072272
  2. Barnes, B. (2001) ‘Practices as Collective Action’. In Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (Eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 17–29. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977453
  3. Blue, S. (2025) Practice Theory and Process Philosophy: Towards a Sociology of Becoming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032685175
  4. Bourdieu, P. ([1979] 2010) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Routledge. [No DOI available]
  5. Cotta, B. (2020) ‘What Goes Around, Comes Around? Access and Allocation Problems in Global North–South Waste Trade’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 20(2), pp. 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09479-3
  6. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017) The New Plastics Economy: Catalysing Action. Available at: this link.
  7. Evans, D.M. (2020) ‘After Practice? Material Semiotic Approaches to Consumption and Economy’, Cultural Sociology, 14(4), pp. 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975520923521
  8. Fine, B. (2005) ‘From Actor-Network Theory to Political Economy’, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(4), pp. 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455750500376057
  9. Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The Subject and Power’, Critical Inquiry, 8(4), pp. 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
  10. Foucault, M. ([1989] 1996) Foucault Live: Collected Interviews, 1961–1984. Lotringer, S. (Ed.), translated by Hochroth, L. and Johnston, J. Semiotext(e). [No DOI available]
  11. Foucault, M. ([1997] 2004) Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. Bertani, M. and Fontana, A. (Eds), translated by D. Macey. Penguin. [No DOI available]
  12. Geels, F., McMeekin, A., Mylan, J. and Southerton, D. (2015) ‘A Critical Appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production Research: The Reformist, Revolutionary and Reconfiguration Positions’, Global Environmental Change, 34, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.013
  13. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press. [No DOI available]
  14. Hanchard M. (2024) Engaging with Digital Maps: Our Knowledgeable Deferral to Rough Guides. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8972-0
  15. Homer-Dixon, T. (2000) Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822997
  16. Holmes, T. (2022) ‘“Where’s the Power in Practice Theory?” Here, There, Everywhere…’. Available at: https://torikholmes.wordpress.com/2022/05/31/wheres-the-power-in-practice-theory-here-there-everywhere/
  17. Holmes, T. (2025) ‘On War and Practice Theory: Difficulties, Dangers, and Unease’, The Journal of Practice Theory, 1, pp. 133–135. https://doi.org/10.71936/zshc-b177
  18. Holmes, T. and Holmes, H. (2024) ‘Domestic ‘Disposal Work’ and Plastics Recycling – Unwrapping Everyday Entanglements of Practice, Roles, and Responsibilities’. Sociological Research Online. 30(3), pp. 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804241259550
  19. Jambeck, J., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., et al. (2015) ‘Plastic Waste Inputs from Land into the Ocean’, Science, 347(6223), pp. 768–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352
  20. Lebreton, L. et al. (2017) ‘River Plastic Emissions to the World’s Oceans’, Nature Communications, 8(1), p. 15611. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611
  21. Liboiron, M. (2016) ‘Redefining Pollution and Action: The Matter of Plastics’, Journal of Material Culture, 21(1), pp. 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183515622966
  22. Liboiron, M. and Lepawsky, J. (2022) Discard Studies: Wasting, Systems, and Power. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12442.001.0001
  23. Lisiecki, M. et al. (2024) ‘Mechanical Recycling of Printed Flexible Plastic Packaging: The Role of Binders and Pigments’, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 472, pp. 134375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134375
  24. Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View. Macmillan. [No DOI available]
  25. Mah, A. (2022) Plastic Unlimited: How Corporations Are Fuelling the Ecological Crisis and What We Can Do About It. Polity. [No DOI available]
  26. Nicolini, D. (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. [No DOI available]
  27. Owens, K. and Conlon, K. (2021) ‘Mopping Up or Turning Off the Tap? Environmental Injustice and The Ethics of Plastic Pollution’, Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, pp. 713385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.713385
  28. Reckwitz, A. (2002) ‘Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturist Theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), pp. 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
  29. Recoup (2023) Plastic Packaging: Recyclability by Design. Available at: https://www.recoup.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/rbd-2022-1687261042.pdf
  30. Recoup (2024) Recyclability by Design: The Essential Guide for all Those Involved in The Development and Design of Plastic Packaging. Available at: https://www.recoup.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/RBD-2024-4.pdf
  31. Savage, G. (2020) ‘What is Policy Assemblage?’, Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(3), pp. 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760
  32. Sayer, A. (2013) ‘Power, Sustainability and Well Being’. In Shove, E. and Spurling, N. (Eds.) Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change, pp 167-180. Routledge. Part of: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203071052
  33. Schatzki, T. (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and The Social. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527470
  34. Schatzki, T. (2002) The Site of The Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Penn State Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271023717
  35. Schatzki, T. (2016) 'Practice Theory as Flat Ontology'. In Spaargaren, G., Weenick, D. and Lamers, M. (Eds.) Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Relevance for Social Change, pp. 28-42. Routledge. Part of: https://doi.org/10.4324/978131565690
  36. Schatzki, T. (2019) Social Change in A Material World: How Activity and Material Processes Dynamize Practices. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032127
  37. Scheurenbrand, K., Schatzki, T., Parsons, E. and Patterson, A. (2024) ‘How Do Unsustainable Practices Remain Dominant? A Practice Theory Reinterpretation of Gramsci’, Sociology, 58(1), pp. 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231178643
  38. Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655
  39. Shove, E., Watson, M. and Spurling, N. (2015) ‘Conceptualising Connections: Energy demand, Infrastructures and Social Practices’, European Journal of Social Theory, 18(3), pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015579964
  40. Soron, D. (2019) ‘Practice Does Not Make Perfect: Sustainable Consumption, Practice Theory, and The Question Of Power’. In Isenhour, C., Martiskainen, M. and Middlemiss, L. (Eds.) Power and Politics in Sustainable Consumption Research and Practice, pp. 45–61. Routledge. Part of: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165509
  41. Southerton, D. and Halford, S. (2025) ‘Sociodigital Practices: Mobilising and Challenging Social Practice Theory’, The Journal of Practice Theory, 1, pp. 79–86. https://doi.org/10.71936/16w1-x211
  42. Southerton, D., Rollason, T., Holmes, T., Rinkinen, J. and Shove, E. (2026) ‘Re-viewed: Alan Warde’s (2005) ‘Consumption and Theories of Practice’ in the Journal of Consumer Culture’, The Journal of Practice Theory, 2, Online First. https://doi.org/10.71936/ggk1-vj64
  43. United Nations (2023) ‘Turning Off the Tap: How the World Can End Plastic Pollution and Create a Circular Economy’, United Nations Environment Programme. Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/turning-off-tap-end-plastic-pollution-create-circular-economy
  44. Voulvoulis, N., Kirkman, R., Giakoumis, T. et al. (2020) ‘Examining Material Evidence: The Carbon Footprint’. British Plastics Federation and Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London. Available at: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/faculty-of-natural-sciences/centre-for-environmental-policy/public/Veolia-Plastic-Whitepaper.pdf
  45. Warde, A. (2005) ‘Consumption and Theories of Practice’, Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), pp. 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090
  46. Watson, M. (2017) ‘Placing Power in Practice Theory’. In Hui, A., Schatzki, T. and Shove, E. (Eds.) The Nexus of Practices, pp. 169–182. Routledge. Part of: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816
  47. Weber, M. ([1920] 1968) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. The Free Press. Translated by Henderson, A. and Parsons, T. [No DOI available]
  48. Zhu, Z., Liu, W., Ye, S. and Batista, L. (2022) ‘Packaging Design for the Circular Economy: A Systematic Review’, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, pp. 817–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.005

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.