Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Sociodigital Practices: Mobilising and Challenging Social Practice Theory

Abstract

In this article, we ask what the emergence of digital technologies means for social practices. We argue that digital forms (devices, data, infrastructures, platforms, etc.) and (many) social practices are entangled such that they should be conceptualised as sociodigital practices. Conceptualised as such, key analytical questions are: How are sociodigital practices configured and reconfigured? And how and what kinds of connections form between sociodigital practices? We demonstrate how five concepts from Social Practice Theory (SPT) – infusing, circulating, merging and emerging, cross-referencing, and interweaving – are instructive for addressing these questions. Four challenges to SPT (and practice theories more broadly) are identified. (1) Analysis needs to extend beyond the everyday to include professional practices and sites of practice performance. (2) Technical expertise and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential to fully grasp the material threads that weave through sociodigital practices. (3) Specific concepts (infusing, cross-referencing, and interweaving) represent important analytical starting points for explaining the extensiveness and density of sociodigital practices. (4) Attention to futures claims as empirical objects of enquiry is necessary to engage with sociodigital future-making practices.

Keywords

circulating, cross-referencing, emerging, infusing, merging, sociodigital

PDF HTML

References

  1. Adam, B. and Groves, C. (2007) Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004161771.i-218
  2. Agar, J. (2013) Constant Touch: A Global History of The Mobile Phone. Icon Books. [No DOI available]
  3. Barad, K. (2003) 'Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of how Matter Comes to Matter', Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), pp. 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
  4. Cochoy, F., Licoppe, C., McIntyre, M., and Sörum, N. (2020) Digitalizing Consumer Society: Equipment and Devices of Digital Consumption, Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(1), pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1702576
  5. Featherstone, M. (2009) 'Ubiquitous Media: An Introduction', Theory, Culture & Society, 26(2-3), pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409103104
  6. Halford, S., Pope, C. and Weal, M. (2013) ‘Digital Futures? Sociological Challenges and Opportunities In The Emergent Semantic Web’, Sociology, 47(1), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512453798
  7. Halford, S., Weal, M., Tinati, R., Pope, C. and Carr, L. (2018) ‘Understanding the Production and Circulation of Social Media Data: Toward Methodological Principles And Praxis’. New Media and Society, 20(9), 3341-3358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817748953
  8. Halford, S. and Southerton, D. (2023) ‘What Future for the Sociology of Futures? Visions, Concepts and Methods’, Sociology, 57(2): 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231157586
  9. Halford, S. and Southerton, D. (2024) Sociodigital Futures? An Agenda for Sociological Research and Practice, Sociologia Italiana, 25(3): 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1485/2281-2652-202426-4
  10. Hanchard M. (2024), Engaging with Digital Maps. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8972-0
  11. Jasanoff, S. (2015 'Imagined and Invented Worlds'. In Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S. (Eds.) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, pp, 321-342. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.003.0015
  12. Korhonen, T., Laakso, N., Seitamaa, et al. (2024). 'Sociodigital Practices, Competences, Mindsets, and Profiles of Finnish Students Before and After the COVID-19 Distance Learning Period', Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2334575
  13. Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
  14. Nicolini, D. (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. [No DOI available]
  15. Plantin, J-C. (2021) 'The Geopolitical Hijacking of Open Networking: The Case of Open RAN' European', Journal of Communication 36(4), pp. 404-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211028375
  16. Poli, R. (2018) 'A Note on The Classification of Future Related Methods', European Journal of Futures Research, 6(15), pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-018-0145-9
  17. Reckwitz, A. (2002) 'Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing', European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), pp. 243-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
  18. Shanahan, M. and Bahia, K. 2024. The State of Mobile Internet Connectivity Report, Global System for Mobile Communications Association. Available at: https://www.gsma.com/r/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/The-State-of-Mobile-Internet-Connectivity-Report-2024.pdf?utm_source=website&utm_medium=button&utm_campaign=somic24
  19. Schatzki, T. (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and The Social. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527470
  20. Schatzki, T. (2011) 'Where the Action Is (On Large Social Phenomena Such as Sociotechnical Regimes)'. Sustainable Practices Research Group Working Paper 1. Available at: http://www.sprg.ac.uk/uploads/schatzki-wp1.pdf.
  21. Schatzki, T. (2019) Social Change in a Material World. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032127
  22. Shove, E. (2023) Connecting Practices: Large Topics in Society and Social Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003275107
  23. Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes. London, Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655
  24. Starosielski, N. (2013) The Undersea Network, Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376224
  25. Stirling, A. (2008) '"Opening Up" and "Closing Down": Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science', Technology and Human Values, 33(2), pp. 262-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265
  26. Strengers, Y., Pink, S., and Nicholls, L. (2019) 'Smart Energy Futures and Social Practice Imaginaries: Forecasting Scenarios for Pet Care in Australian Homes', Energy Research & Social Science, 48, pp. 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.015
  27. Urry, J. (2016) What is the Future?. Polity. [No DOI available]
  28. Van Lente, H. (2012) Navigating Foresight in A Sea of Expectations: Lessons from The Sociology of Expectations. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 24(8), pp. 769-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.715478
  29. Warde, A. (2016) The Practice of Eating. Polity. [No DOI available]