Vol. 2 (2026)

Articles - (Open)

How Practices Become Knowable: Towards a Practice Hermeneutics

Published 09-01-2026

  • Inti José Lammi

Inti José Lammi
Mälardalen University; Uppsala University

A circle through which practices become intelligible

Abstract

Abstract

This paper asks how practices become knowable in empirical research. Practice theories conceive of social life as organised through nexuses of doings and sayings, but studying those nexuses requires representing them. The resulting tension – how to make practices visible without reducing them to representations – defines the epistemic challenge of practice-based enquiry. Drawing on Dimitri Ginev’s hermeneutic theory of social practices, I develop ‘practice hermeneutics’: an interpretative framework that clarifies how researchers might disclose practices by interpreting their traces. This approach explicates the hermeneutic movement between familiarity and articulation – the circle through which practices become intelligible – and proposes standards of disclosive adequacy for empirical work. By showing how enquiry itself unfolds within the same world of practices it seeks to understand, the paper advances a hermeneutic foundation for practice research and invites further exploration of its methodological implications.

Keywords

epistemology, interpretation, hermenuetics, methodology

PDF HTML

References

  1. Blumer, H. (1954) ‘What is Wrong with Social Theory?’, American Sociological Review, 19(1), pp. 3-10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165
  2. Bourdieu, P. ([1972] 1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. Translated by R. Nice. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
  3. Bourdieu, P. ([1980] 1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge University Press. Translated by R. Nice. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
  4. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Corradi, G., Gherardi, S. and Verzelloni, L. (2010) ‘Through the Practice Lens: Where is the Bandwagon of Practice-Based Studies Heading?’, Management Learning, 41(3), pp. 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609356938
  6. DiMaggio, P., Nag, M. and Blei, D. (2013) Exploiting Affinities Between Topic Modeling and The Sociological Perspective on Culture: Application to Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Government Arts Funding. Poetics, 41(6), pp. 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004
  7. Dreyfus, H. (1991) Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. MIT Press. [No DOI available]
  8. Gadamer, H. ([1960] 1989) Truth and Method. Continuum. Translated by J. Weinsheimer and D. Marshall. [No DOI available]
  9. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Inc. [No DOI available]
  10. Gherardi, S. (2006) Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Blackwell. [No DOI available]
  11. Gherardi, S. (2015) ‘To Start Practice Theorizing Anew: The Contribution of the Concepts of Agencement and Formativeness.’ Organization, 23(5), 680–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415605174
  12. Gherardi, S. (2016) ‘Sociomateriality in Posthuman Practice Theory’. In Hui, A., Shove, E. and Schatzki, T. (Eds.) The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, pp. 38-51. Routledge. Part of: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816
  13. Gherardi, S. (2019) How to Conduct a Practice-Based Study: Problems and Methods (2nd edn.). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973564
  14. Gherardi, S. (2025) What is the Place of the Human Being in Practice Theories? An Answer from a Posthumanist Position, 1, Online First. https://doi.org/10.71936/WKM2-9S32
  15. Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
  16. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press. [No DOI available]
  17. Ginev, D. (2018) Toward a Hermeneutic Theory of Social Practices: Between Existential Analytic and Social Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167770
  18. Gioia, D., Corley, K. and Hamilton, A. (2013) ‘Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes On The Gioia Methodology’, Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), pp. 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
  19. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
  20. Heidegger, M. ([1927] 1962) Being and Time. Blackwell. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. [No DOI available]
  21. Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity Press. [No DOI available]
  22. Hui, A. (2023) ‘Situating Decolonial Strategies Within Methodologies-In/As-Practices: A Critical Appraisal’, The Sociological Review, 71(5), pp. 1075–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261231153752
  23. Hui, A., Schatzki, T. and Shove, E. (2016) ‘Introduction’. In Hui, A., Shove, E. and Schatzki, T. (Eds.) The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, pp. 1–7. Routledge. Part of: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816
  24. Jonas, M., Littig, B. and Wroblewski, A. (2017) Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7
  25. Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C. et al. (2014) ‘Praxis, Practice and Practice Architectures’. In Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C. et al. (Eds.) Changing Practices, Changing Education, pp. 25–41. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4_2
  26. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  27. Massumi, B. (1995) ‘The Autonomy of Affect’, Cultural Critique, 31, pp. 83–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446
  28. Massumi, B. (2002) Parables for the Virtual. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383574
  29. Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384151
  30. Nicolini, D. (2009) ‘Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections’, Organization Studies, 30(12), pp. 1391-1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349875
  31. Nicolini, D. (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. [No DOI available]
  32. Nicolini, D. (2017) ‘Practice Theory as a Package of Theory, Method and Vocabulary: Affordances and Limitations’. In Jonas, M., Littig, B. and Wroblewski, A. (Eds.) Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, pp. 19–34. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7_2
  33. Nicolini, D. and Monteiro, P. (2016) ‘The Practice Approach: For a Praxeology of Organisational and Management Studies’. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies, pp. 110–126. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957954.n7
  34. Orr, J. (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. ILR Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501707407
  35. Reckwitz, A. (2002) 'Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing', European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), pp. 243-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
  36. Reckwitz, A. (2017) ‘Practices and their Affects’. In Hui, A., Shove, E., and Schatzki, T. (Eds.) The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, pp. 114–125. Routledge. Part of: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816
  37. Rouse, J. (2007) ‘Social Practices and Normativity’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(1), pp. 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393106296542
  38. Schäfer, H. (2017) ‘Relationality and Heterogeneity: Transitive Methodology in Practice Theory and Actor-Network Theory’. In Jonas, M., Littig, B. and Wroblewski, A. (Eds.) Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, pp. 35–46. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7_3
  39. Schatzki, T. (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and The Social. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527470
  40. Schatzki, T. (2001) ‘Introduction: Practice Theory’. In Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (Eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 10-23. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977453
  41. Schatzki, T. (2002) The Site of The Social: A Philosophical Account of The Constitution of Social Life and Change. Penn State Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271023717
  42. Schatzki, T. (2010a). ‘Materiality and Social Life’. Nature and Culture 5(2): 123–49. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2010.050202.
  43. Schatzki, T. (2010b) The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Lexington Books. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781978737358
  44. Schatzki, T. (2019) Social Change in a Material World. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032127
  45. Schmidt, R. (2017) ‘Sociology of Social Practices: Theory or Modus Operandi of Empirical Research?’. In Jonas, M., Littig, B. and Wroblewski, A. (Eds.) Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, pp. 3–18. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52897-7_1
  46. Shove, E. (2010) ‘Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(6), pp. 1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42282
  47. Shove, E. (2017) ‘Practice Theory Methodologies Do Not Exist’. Practice Theory Methodologies. Available at: https://practicetheorymethodologies.wordpress.com/2017/02/15/elizabeth-shove-practice-theory-methodologies-do-not-exist/
  48. Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655
  49. Spaargaren, G., Weenink, D and Lamers, M. (2016) Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131565690
  50. Turner, S. (2001) ‘Throwing Out the Tacit Rule Book’. In Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (Eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 120-130. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977453
  51. Warde, A. (2005) ‘Consumption and Theories of Practice’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), pp. 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090
  52. Welch, D. and Warde, A. (2016) ‘How Should We Understand “General Understandings”?’. In Hui, A., Shove, E. and Schatzki, T. (Eds.) The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, pp. 183–196. Routledge. Part of: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816
  53. Wittgenstein, L. ([1953] 1958) Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.Anscombe. Prentice-Hall. [No DOI available]
  54. Wittgenstein, L. (1969) On Certainty. Anscombe, G. and von Wright, G. (Eds.), Translated by D. Paul and G. Anscombe. Blackwell. [No DOI Available]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.