logo

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Activity theory in technology enhanced learning research

Using activity theory to redesign a video supported oral presentation competence development activity in higher education

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.eb8dcf2b
Submitted
9 August 2026
Published
15-08-2026

Abstract

This is a single site study in a post-1992 university law school in England using activity theory to explore how video recordings of undergraduate law students’ oral presentations can be used as a feedback tool to support the development of oral presentation competence. While there is extensive literature on both the role of feedback in higher education and oral presentation competence development, the link between the two areas has had only limited attention. For this study, 19 students enrolled on a level 4 oral presentation competence development unit were interviewed at three points during the academic year. Activity theory was used to reconceptualise the oral presentation competence development activity and to consider how video can best be used as a feedback tool to support the learning activity. The research analysis demonstrates that video can help students to evaluate their own performances and make adjustments to future performances. However, the research also indicates that there are potential barriers to video being used effectively. These barriers can best be overcome by emphasising the social aspects of the activity. In particular, a focus on video recordings of student performances should be delayed until students have gained experience of evaluation and developed subject specific notions of quality through giving and receiving peer feedback. By using activity theory to reconceptualise the activity to emphasise its social aspects and foreground the role of self-evaluation, this research offers an insight into how video can most effectively be used as a feedback tool to support oral presentation competence development.

References

  1. Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Dawson, P., & Boud, D. (2018). Conceptualising evaluative judgement for sustainable assessment in higher education. In D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, & P. Dawson (Eds.), Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education: Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work (pp. 7-19). Routledge.
  2. Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a wiki environment. Computers & Education, 59(3), 855–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.008
  3. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity theory in empirical higher education research: choices, uses and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
  4. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
  5. Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2015). The calibration of student judgement through self-assessment: Disruptive effects of assessment patterns. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934328
  6. Brooke, H. (2015) A lifetime in the law. Henry Brooke. Retrieved 20 April 2018 from https://sirhenrybrooke.me/2015/10/14/a-lifetime-in-the-law/
  7. Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
  8. Carless, D., Chan, K., To, J., Lo, M., & Barret, E. (2018). Developing students’ capacities for evaluative judgement through analysing exemplars. In D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, & J. Tai (Eds.), Developing evaluative judgement in higher education (pp. 108–116). Taylor & Francis.
  9. Chong, S. W. (2021). Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 92-104, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765
  10. Davies, G.L. & Welsh, J. (2016). Advocacy 20 years on from Hampel: Is it time we revisited the postgraduate teaching of advocacy? The Law Teacher, 51(4): 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2016.1201740
  11. Day, I., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Online peer feedback on video presentations: type of feedback and improvement of presentation skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1904826
  12. De Grez, L., Valcke, M. & Roozen, I. (2014). The differential impact of observational learning and practice-based learning on the development of oral presentation skills in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.832155
  13. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/13639080123238
  14. Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744
  15. Esterhazy, R., & Damşa, C. (2019). Unpacking the feedback process: an analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional meaning-making of feedback comments. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249
  16. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
  17. Hardman, J. (2005). Activity theory as a potential framework for technology research in an unequal terrain. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19(2), 378–392.
  18. Havnes, A. (2004). Examination and learning: An activity‐theoretical analysis of the relationship between assessment and educational practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000188456
  19. Holman, D., Pavlica, K. & Thorpe, R. (1997). Rethinking Kolb’s theory of experiential learning in management education. Management Learning, 28(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1350507697282003
  20. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press.
  21. Kolb, D, A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
  22. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
  23. Leenknecht, M., Hompus, P., & van der Schaaf, M. (2019). Feedback seeking behaviour in higher education: The association with students’ goal orientation and deep learning approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1069-1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1571161
  24. Leontʹev, A. (2009). The development of mind: Selected works. Marxists Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/admin/books/activity-theory/leontyev/development-mind.pdf
  25. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053690
  26. McConlogue, T. (2015). Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1495–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.868878
  27. Moffitt, P., & Bligh, B. (2021). Video and the pedagogy of expansive learning: Insights from a research-intervention in engineering education. In D. Gedera & A. Zalipour (Eds.), Video Pedagogy (pp. 123–145). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4009-1_7
  28. Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: The learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information. Medical Education, 47(3), 227–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12116
  29. Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
  30. Murphy, K. & Barry, S. (2016). Feed-forward: Students gaining more from assessment via deeper engagement in video-recorded presentations. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.996206
  31. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
  32. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
  33. Nicol, D. (2019). Reconceptualising feedback as an internal not an external process. Italian Journal of Educational Research, Special Issue,71–83. https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/sird/article/view/3270
  34. Parkin, H. J., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., & Thorpe, L. (2012). A role for technology in enhancing students’ engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.592934
  35. Pitt, E. (2019). Operationalising Dialogic Feedback to Develop Students’ Evaluative Judgement and Enactment of Feedback. In M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D., Boud, E. Molloy (Eds.). The impact of feedback in higher education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_8
  36. Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
  37. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90024-8
  38. Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Self-assessment of video-recorded presentations: Does it improve skills? Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787416654807
  39. Simpson, T., Holden, K., Merrick, D., Dawson, S., & Bedford, L. (2019). Does video feedback & peer observation offer a valid method of reinforcing oral presentation training for undergraduate biochemists? Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 262–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1587717
  40. Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2017). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work, Higher Education. 76(3), 467-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
  41. Tailab, M. M. K., & Marsh, N. Y. (2020). Use of Self-Assessment of Video Recording to Raise Students’ Awareness of Development of Their Oral Presentation Skills. Higher Education Studies, 10(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n1p16
  42. Trowler, P. (2011). Researching your own institution: Higher Education. British Educational Research Association. http://www.bera.ac.uk/resources/researching-your-own-institution-higher-education
  43. Tsang, A. (2018). Positive effects of a programme on oral presentation skills: High- and low-proficient learners’ self-evaluations and perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1407917
  44. Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. Springer Science & Business Media.