Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Editorials

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Activity theory in technology enhanced learning research

Activity theory in technology enhanced learning research: An introduction to the special issue

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.2b6e712d
Submitted
24 August 2026
Published
17-07-2023

Abstract

Activity Theory (sometimes known as Cultural Historical Activity Theory, or CHAT) is an established theory widely used in Technology Enhanced Learning research, just as it is in a range of other fields of enquiry. A theory considered very mature yet still under active development, Activity Theory is often valued for its ability to grasp the dynamics of complex social situations and place phenomena in context (Bligh & Flood, 2017). Usefully for technology enhanced learning researchers, the theory also foregrounds the role of ‘technologies’ as being central to everything that humans do. Yet the theory is also often criticised, including for emphasising a dense terminology unforgiving on newcomers, leading to questions about whether the extra conceptual effort is worthwhile for researchers.

This Special Issue will consider the use of Activity Theory within Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) research. We invited papers describing research endeavours with Activity Theory, particularly those where the social and cultural contexts of technologies were important in enhancing learning. We were particularly keen to receive submissions that aimed to contribute to making the theory more accessible and applicable to research in the field, that examined how the theory has been (and might be) used in the field, or that emphasised the mediating role of technologies for purposeful human activity.

References

  1. Al-Ali, S. (2020). Activity systems analysis: A maze worth exploring. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.39ed7528
  2. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity Theory in empirical higher education research: choices, uses, and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(2), 125-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
  3. Bligh, B., & Lee, K. (2020). Debating the status of ‘theory’ in technology enhanced learning research: Introduction to the Special Inaugural Issue. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.4d86b045
  4. Gatrell, D. (2022). Challenges and opportunities: Videoconferencing, innovation and development. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(2), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.f347ddf1
  5. Miles, R. (2020). Making a case for Cultural Historical Activity Theory: Examples of CHAT in practice. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.c4feefa5
  6. Minton, M., & Bligh, B. (2021). Examining the use of Kahoot to support digital game-based formative assessments in UAE higher education. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.32b8666f
  7. Moffitt, P. (2022). Visual forms of mediating artefacts: A research-intervention in engineering education. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.3e816f8f