Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Bordering and Insurgency: Towards a Decolonial Practice-Based Approach

An abstract image of dark blue arrows on a red background

Abstract

This essay advances a decolonial agenda for practice-based research through the concepts of bordering and insurgency, introduced as generative tools for rethinking how practices are theorised and studied. While practice theories have contributed significantly to overcoming dualisms and foregrounding relationality, many empirical applications continue to overlook colonial histories, power asymmetries, and intersectional dynamics that shape social practices. Drawing on decolonial ideas, I propose an affirmative orientation that expands the analytical and ethical scope of practice theories. Bordering invites attention to the epistemic boundaries that legitimise certain practices while marginalising others, while insurgency foregrounds the knowledges and actions that emerge from sites of resistance. Together, these concepts support a more plural, situated, and reflexive engagement with practice - one that is attuned to historical legacies, ongoing exclusions, and the political stakes of knowing and doing. The essay concludes by encouraging future research that embraces epistemic diversity and cultivates methodologies capable of engaging with contested and emergent forms of practice.

Keywords

colonisation, decolonisation, intersectionality, social theory

PDF HTML

References

  1. Akotirene, C. (2023) Interseccionalidade: Feminismos Plurais [Intersectionality: Plural Feminisms]. Edited by D Ribeiro. Jandaíra. [No DOI available; no English translation available]
  2. Alkemeyer, T., Buschman, N. and Michaeler, M. (2017) ‘Critique in Praxis: Arguments for a Subjectivation Theoretical Expansion on Practice Theory’. In: Jonas, M. and Littig, B. (Eds.) Praxeological Political Analysis, pp. 67-84. Routledge. Part of: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628479
  3. Anzaldúa, G. ([1987] 1999) Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza (2nd edn.). Aunt Lute Books. [No DOI available]
  4. Ballestrin, L. (2013) ‘América Latina e o Giro Decolonial’ [Decolonial Turn and Latin America]. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 11, pp. 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-33522013000200004 [No English translation available]
  5. Bjerregaard, T. and Klitmøller, A. (2016) ‘Conflictual Practice Sharing in the MNC: A Theory of Practice Approach’, Organization Studies, 37(9), pp. 1271–1295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616634126
  6. Collins, P. (2019) Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007098
  7. Danner-Schröder, A., Mahringer, C., Sele, K. et al. (2025) ‘Tackling Grand Challenges: Insights and Contributions from Practice Theories’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 34(2), pp. 143–166, https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926241292262
  8. Dixit, R. (2023) ‘Caste(d) Knowledges: (Self)-Problematising Epistemic Impunity and Caste-Privilege in Academia’. Organization, 32(3), pp. 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231204102
  9. Escobar, A. (2018) Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816
  10. Gherardi, S. (2022) 'A Posthumanist Epistemology of Practice'. In Neesham, C., Reihlen, M., and Schoeneborn, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Philosophy of Management, pp. 99-120. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76606-1_53
  11. Girei, E. (2017) ‘Decolonising Management Knowledge: A Reflexive Journey as Practitioner and Researcher in Uganda’. Management Learning, 48(4), pp. 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507617697867
  12. Hui, A. (2023) ‘Situating Decolonial Strategies within Methodologies-in/as-Practices: A Critical Appraisal’. The Sociological Review, 71(5), pp. 1075-1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261231153752
  13. Ibarra-Colado, E. (2006) ‘Organization Studies and Epistemic Coloniality in Latin America: Thinking Otherness from the Margins’. Organization, 13(4), pp. 463-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406065851
  14. Jamali, D., Leigh, J., Samara, G. and Barkemeyer, R. (2021) ‘Grand Challenges in Developing Countries: Context, Relationships, and Logics’. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 30(S1), pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12370
  15. Jonas, M., and Littig, B. (2017) ‘A Praxeological Political Analysis: An Introduction’. In Jonas, M. and Littig, B. (Eds.) Praxeological Political Analysis, pp. 1–12. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628479-6
  16. Koddenbrock, K. (2017) ‘Totality and Practices: The Dangers of Empiricism and the Promise of A 'Logic of Reconstruction' in Practice-Based Research’. In Jonas, M. and Littig, B. (Eds.) Praxeological Political Analysis, pp. 141–158. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628479-14
  17. Liu, H. (2022) ‘How We Learn Whiteness: Disciplining and Resisting Management Knowledge’. Management Learning, 53(5), pp. 776-796. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076211061622
  18. Lugones, M. (2014) ‘Rumo a um Feminismo Descolonial’ [Towards a Decolonial Feminism]. Revista Estudos Feministas, 22(3), pp. 935-952. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2014000300013 [No English translation available]
  19. Lüthy, C. (2024) ‘Mobilising Affect for Public Art: Affective Practices in Voluntary Organising’, Organization Studies, 45(11), pp. 1555-1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406241273828
  20. Mignolo, W. (2009) ‘Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom’. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7-8), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
  21. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870112
  22. Quijano, A. (2000) ‘Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America.’ International Sociology, 15(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
  23. Schatzki, T. (2012). ‘A Primer on Practices: Perspectives and Strategies.’ In Higgs, J., Barnett, R., Billett, S., Hutchings, M. and Trede, F. (Eds.) Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies, pp. 13–26. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-128-3_2.
  24. Schatzki, T. (2002). The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Pennsylvania State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271023717-005
  25. Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (2001) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977453
  26. Scobie, M., Lee, B., and Smyth, S. (2021) ‘Braiding Together Student and Supervisor Aspirations in a Struggle to Decolonize.’ Organization, 28(5), pp. 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211015370
  27. Śliwa, M., Decker, S., de Barros, A., Omeihe, K., and Prasad, A. (2025) ‘Decolonising the Business and Management Curriculum’. Management Learning, 56(1), pp. 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076251323764