Navigating the Liminal Space Between Pedagogy and Subject Expertise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71634/qbdc-6b30Keywords:
Scholarship, SoTL, Research-informed Teaching, Reflective Practice, Academic IdentityAbstract
Higher education is at a crossroads. As students navigate an increasingly complex world shaped by digital transformation, global uncertainty, and shifting conceptions of knowledge, the traditional model of the university as a conduit for knowledge transfer is no longer tenable. This editorial argues that effective teaching today resides in a liminal space, between disciplinary expertise and the facilitation of learning, and that navigating this space requires a fundamental rethinking of the educator’s role.
Rather than treating research and teaching as competing priorities, universities must embrace the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) as a mode of inquiry that is intellectually rigorous, contextually grounded, and unapologetically student-focused. Drawing on influential frameworks by Boyer, Trigwell, and Felten, the editorial contends that SoTL is not an optional supplement but a necessary condition for pedagogical integrity and institutional relevance. It calls on educators to reimagine their academic identity as one that integrates scholarly teaching with reflective practice, and on institutions to recognise and reward such work. In doing so, it reframes teaching not as delivery but as design, not as performance but as participation in a shared scholarly endeavour.
References
Asarta, C. J., Bento, R., Fornaciari, C. J., Lund Dean, K., Arbaugh, J. B., & Hwang, A. (2018). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Changing the Dominant Narrative About (and In) Research Institutions. Journal of Management Education, 42(6), 731–748.
Beatty, J. E., & Leigh, J. S. A. (2010). Taking Stock of Management Education: A Comparison of Three Management Education Journals. Journal of Management Education, 34(3), 367-392.
Boyer, E. L. (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate The Carnegie Foundation For The Advancement Of Teaching [online] https://www.umces.edu/sites/default/files/al/pdfs/BoyerScholarshipReconsidered.pdf
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of Good Practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121-125.
Mason, C. M. (1905) School Education: developing a curriculum
Schmidt-Wilk, J. (2010). Signature Pedagogy: A Framework for Thinking about Management Education. Journal of Management Education, 34(4), 491-495.
Sharif, A. (2020). Learning about learning: why universities, knowledge and learning are so important in our current era. Higher Education Policy Institute. [online] https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2020/07/28/learning-about-learning-why-universities-knowledge-and-learning-are-so-important-in-our-current-era/
Shulman, L. S. (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus; 134 (3): 52–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015
Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of Teaching: A Model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 155-168.
Woodhouse, R. A. (2010). Hype or Hope: Can the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Fulfill Its Promise? International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Neil Ralph (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.